Comments on: WebKitGTK+ 1.1.1

By: krit

krit — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:42:12 +0000

@Prakash: Ubuntu maybe uses pango. You only get 100/100 with freetype-fonts.

By: Peng’s links for Friday, 13 Mar « I’m Just an Avatar

Peng’s links for Friday, 13 Mar « I’m Just an Avatar — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:55:57 +0000

[...] Stemp Xan: WebKitGTK+ 1.1.1 [...]

By: xan

xan — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:42:49 +0000

@Samuel B. Quiring: it’s still pretty basic, but we are working to improve it.

By: Samuel B. Quiring

Samuel B. Quiring — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:40:25 +0000

What is the status of Accessibility support in WebKitGTK+ 1.1.1?

By: Adrian Bunk

Adrian Bunk — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 15:48:39 +0000

If I can help with manpower for anything that does not require deeper WebKit knowledge (like for making releases) please drop me a note.

By: xan

xan — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 09:43:16 +0000

@Adrian Bunk: we’ll probably do something like this before stable releases, but I dont think it makes sense to do this before each unstable release (and we don’t have the manpower to do it anyway).

By: Adrian Bunk

Adrian Bunk — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:12:23 +0000

Thanks a lot.

Just one wish:
Could you create for future WebKitGtk releases release candidates, and announce them in your blog? I would then check whether the release candidate causes any regression for Liferea (and hopefully other people would try it with other applications), which might catch regressions before they go into a release.

Thanks in advance

By: » PyWebKitGtk 1.1 .liferc

» PyWebKitGtk 1.1 .liferc — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 07:45:18 +0000

[...] API is based on WebKitGtk 1.1 which was released six days ago. So whatever feature they have for that release is supported in this [...]

By: Pierre-Luc Beaudoin

Pierre-Luc Beaudoin — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:11:50 +0000

Congrats!

By: glandium

glandium — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:33:10 +0000

There was a 1.0.3 ? I’ve never seen another tarball than 1.0.1 !