<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The show so far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:05:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Baas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Baas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Xan, flash ads are not block by the adblocking, while on midori (0.2.0) it all gets blocked without a problem. I am using epiphany 2.28.1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xan, flash ads are not block by the adblocking, while on midori (0.2.0) it all gets blocked without a problem. I am using epiphany 2.28.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molecule-eye</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>molecule-eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-340</guid>
		<description>How do you get adblock working on 2.27.x? In general how do you gain access to epiphany-webkit extensions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you get adblock working on 2.27.x? In general how do you gain access to epiphany-webkit extensions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GNOME Commit-Digest &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Issue 49</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>GNOME Commit-Digest &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Issue 49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-322</guid>
		<description>[...] adblock Epiphany extension has been updated to work with Epiphany/webkit, Xan Lopez blogged this and other Epiphany features . (GNOME bug [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] adblock Epiphany extension has been updated to work with Epiphany/webkit, Xan Lopez blogged this and other Epiphany features . (GNOME bug [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>xan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-316</guid>
		<description>@eero: we are using -fvisibility-hidden, so I think we are doing OK in that regard.

@Mike: doing something Chrome-like is an interesting idea and definitely in our possible plans, but it won&#039;t happen for 2.30 :)

@Michael: I believe that extension already is working in ephy/webkit, although in a very rough form. I guess we can try to check evince to see what it does there, but please open a bug about it so that we don&#039;t forget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@eero: we are using -fvisibility-hidden, so I think we are doing OK in that regard.</p>
<p>@Mike: doing something Chrome-like is an interesting idea and definitely in our possible plans, but it won&#8217;t happen for 2.30 <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Michael: I believe that extension already is working in ephy/webkit, although in a very rough form. I guess we can try to check evince to see what it does there, but please open a bug about it so that we don&#8217;t forget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Flaig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Flaig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Hey,

I&#039;m already using epiphany-webkit and it really is getting ready to rock.

One thing I still really miss is the ability to scroll with middle mouse like I could though an extension in epiphany-gecko. Point is, that I use a tablet pc and I really like to hold down the button on the pen and scroll by moving the pen up and down. This works okay in epiphany-gecko, but really really great in evince, maybe it would be possible to get it the same way in epiphany-webkit?

Cheers,

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m already using epiphany-webkit and it really is getting ready to rock.</p>
<p>One thing I still really miss is the ability to scroll with middle mouse like I could though an extension in epiphany-gecko. Point is, that I use a tablet pc and I really like to hold down the button on the pen and scroll by moving the pen up and down. This works okay in epiphany-gecko, but really really great in evince, maybe it would be possible to get it the same way in epiphany-webkit?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Flaig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Flaig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Hey,

I&#039;m already using epiphany-webkit and it really is getting ready to rock.

One thing I still really miss is the ability to scroll with middle mouse like I could though an extension in epiphany-gecko. Point is, that I use a tablet pc and I really like to hold down the button on the pen and scroll by moving the pen up and down. This works okay in epiphany-gecko, but really really great in evince, maybe it would be possible to get it the same way in epiphany-webkit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m already using epiphany-webkit and it really is getting ready to rock.</p>
<p>One thing I still really miss is the ability to scroll with middle mouse like I could though an extension in epiphany-gecko. Point is, that I use a tablet pc and I really like to hold down the button on the pen and scroll by moving the pen up and down. This works okay in epiphany-gecko, but really really great in evince, maybe it would be possible to get it the same way in epiphany-webkit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Perez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-313</guid>
		<description>I am very excited about this, because not having the AdBlock extension was one of the things that prevented me to use Epiphany-WebKit in a daily basis. Also, the  SoupSession thing look very itneresting also for web developers. Great work, mate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very excited about this, because not having the AdBlock extension was one of the things that prevented me to use Epiphany-WebKit in a daily basis. Also, the  SoupSession thing look very itneresting also for web developers. Great work, mate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Rocha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Rocha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Great work dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work dude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eero Tamminen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Eero Tamminen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-311</guid>
		<description>&quot;when I wasted a couple of days chasing phantom crashes in WebKitGTK+, only to find out it was a bug in GNU ld to begin with&quot;

I guess WebKitGTK+ is hiding the unnecessary library symbols i.e .the reason wasn&#039;t too many exported symbols?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;when I wasted a couple of days chasing phantom crashes in WebKitGTK+, only to find out it was a bug in GNU ld to begin with&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess WebKitGTK+ is hiding the unnecessary library symbols i.e .the reason wasn&#8217;t too many exported symbols?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/?p=74#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what I would like to see.

An Epiphany Instance would be cool.

Not like raw WebKit GTK, but a Epiphany rendering which is connected to the keyring and custom settings.

So one could easily build prism-like single apps, which wouldn&#039;t need to keep their own keys and cookies around :)

This could also lead to a chromium like &quot;instances&quot; features, so that one page/plugin doesn&#039;t crash the whole browser.

Is this planned for 3.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I would like to see.</p>
<p>An Epiphany Instance would be cool.</p>
<p>Not like raw WebKit GTK, but a Epiphany rendering which is connected to the keyring and custom settings.</p>
<p>So one could easily build prism-like single apps, which wouldn&#8217;t need to keep their own keys and cookies around <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This could also lead to a chromium like &#8220;instances&#8221; features, so that one page/plugin doesn&#8217;t crash the whole browser.</p>
<p>Is this planned for 3.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/xan/2009/09/08/the-show-so-far/feed/ ) in 0.18303 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 7:22 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 8:22 pm UTC -->
