<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: gnu 1, windows 0</title>
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs diary</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 08:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>stop complaining about an exotic version of windows. Windows XP does the job right. Linux on the other side, is anybody's guess on doing day to day jobs. Hell, I've seen an article where openoffice 2.4 doesnt preserve the formatting of documents created with oo 2.0. To my knowledge, ms office is very good at compatibility. So, stop complaining about windows. And who the hell uses 64 bit Windows anyway? Or linux? Nobody, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stop complaining about an exotic version of windows. Windows XP does the job right. Linux on the other side, is anybody&#8217;s guess on doing day to day jobs. Hell, I&#8217;ve seen an article where openoffice 2.4 doesnt preserve the formatting of documents created with oo 2.0. To my knowledge, ms office is very good at compatibility. So, stop complaining about windows. And who the hell uses 64 bit Windows anyway? Or linux? Nobody, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Of course on regular XP it would have been Install driver, Scan.  So for 99% of the windows users out there, it's still much easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course on regular XP it would have been Install driver, Scan.  So for 99% of the windows users out there, it&#8217;s still much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>buh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>you sack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you sack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menko</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>menko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Windows (64) is crap.

Both XP and Vista. Nothing works anymore...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows (64) is crap.</p>
<p>Both XP and Vista. Nothing works anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethana2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>ethana2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>One of the most obvious advantages of OSS is ISA neutrality.  If I want to go ARM or CellBE, fine.  All I lose is flash, acroread, and my WINE apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most obvious advantages of OSS is ISA neutrality.  If I want to go ARM or CellBE, fine.  All I lose is flash, acroread, and my WINE apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnu 1, windows 0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>gnu 1, windows 0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] Valhalla Torrent Blog Community wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptgnu 1, windows 0 April 29, 2008 – 7:13 am Sometimes it’s the little things. I needed to scan a page into the computer to send in an email, and I thought ‘no worries, there’s a scanner at work doing nothing i’ll give that a go’. Oops, we only have Windows XP x86_64 and the drivers wont work. Fortunately I have a couple of linux distros installed on one of the machines which I never use, so I thought i’d give one a go. Didn’t work first time, wasn’t the easiest thing in the world, e.g. I had t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Valhalla Torrent Blog Community wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptgnu 1, windows 0 April 29, 2008 – 7:13 am Sometimes it’s the little things. I needed to scan a page into the computer to send in an email, and I thought ‘no worries, there’s a scanner at work doing nothing i’ll give that a go’. Oops, we only have Windows XP x86_64 and the drivers wont work. Fortunately I have a couple of linux distros installed on one of the machines which I never use, so I thought i’d give one a go. Didn’t work first time, wasn’t the easiest thing in the world, e.g. I had t [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Gomez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/zucchi/2008/04/29/gnu-1-windows-0/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>What make and model of scanner is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What make and model of scanner is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
