The daddy of all bombs

10:57 am General

It is environmentally friendly, compared to a nuclear bomb

What a recommendation for Russia’s newest monstrosity

4 Responses

  1. alexander Says:

    In 2003 USA showed just the same bomb – they called it “mother of all bombs”. Why didn’t you blame them?

    Double standards, I guess…

  2. Paul Cooper Says:

    It’s the new meme in marketing, where everything has to be labeled as environmentally friendly (as compared to some other product) until the phrase has no meaning (if it ever had any to start with). Every other product category is doing it so why can’t the arms industry join in 😉

  3. Dave Neary Says:

    Alexander: I will happily acknowledge that the latest monstrosity from the USA is also more environmentally friendly than a thermonuclear weapon.

    Happy now?

  4. alexander Says:

    I would like not to hear both of the news due to absence of the reason 🙂

Leave a Comment

Your comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.