Been some discussion here in Norway if the attack on Iraq
is within the framework of international law or not, since there was no new UN resolution specifically approving the use of millitary force. Whenever I hear that I wonder what these people think the words ‘serious consequences’, that where used in the last resolution approved if Iraq did not comply, meant. For some reason I doubt they are actually so naive that they thought it meant sending in an old granny to tell Saddam he was being a bad boy and refuse him dinner……..