GNOME Software on MATE and XFCE

Hi all.

tl;dr: If you want to run GNOME Software on MATE or XFCE you need to set an environment variable like GNOME_SOFTWARE_COMPATIBLE_PROJECTS=MATE,GNOME,XFCE

Long version: In the software application we have the problem where applications have the same name and summary, but are targeted against different desktops. We know when an app targets a specific desktop from the AppStream metadata (which currently uses a heuristic from the .desktop file) so we could filter these out client side. At the moment searching for notes gives you two similarly looking results results provided by two different applications: bijiben (GNOME) and xfce4-notes (XFCE). Also, because of the shared history, a lot of the MATE applications have the same name as the GNOME ones. This makes bad UI.

The default is GNOME_SOFTWARE_COMPATIBLE_PROJECTS=GNOME (well, it is gnome-software after-all…) but if you want to show MATE projects and hide the core GNOME ones, just use a setting of MATE. If you want XFCE, GNOME and MATE apps to show, just use MATE,GNOME,XFCE.

As usual, comments and suggestions welcome.

AppData validation tool

A upstream maintainers have contacted me about some kind of validation tool for AppData files. I’ve spent a couple of days creating and then packaging appdata-tools which includes the appdata-validate command. This returns non-zero if there are any syntax or style issues with the AppData file.

I’d appreciate it if a few people could try it out before I start running it in the compose tool. There are already a few failures with the new builds in Fedora 20 Alpha RC3. If you’d rather install a package, I’ve just built it for rawhide, F20 and F19.

Comments and suggestions welcome.

My application isn’t showing in the GNOME Software Center!

First, don’t panic, it’s not some big secret agenda, or any kind of Swedish conspiracy. The Fedora AppStream generator ignores your application if:

  • There is no Name or Comment in the desktop file. You need both.
  • There is no application icon, or if the application icon is missing or less than 32×32 in size
  • Your desktop file has NoDisplay=true
  • Your desktop file does not have Type=Application
  • Your application ID or package file name has been blacklisted.
  • Your application is really just a settings panel
  • Your application isn’t available in fedora or fedora-updates for F20

If you see anything in GNOME Software that you think should not be there, let me know and we can review it. Note, for Fedora 21, i.e. not the Fedora release about to happen they’ll be one extra point where we will disqualify applications:

  • Your application does not contain a .appdata.xml file with at least one screenshot.

So that’s 6 months to get your AppData files upstream before we get all strict. Go!

Another request to the community for AppData details

Do you use or maintain or use any of these application:

Evince, GNOME Calculator, gucharmap, GNOME Clocks, GNOME Dictionary, GNOME Documents, Empathy, Evolution, Nautilus, GNOME Font Viewer, Glade, DevHelp, Eye of GNOME, GNOME Screenshot, Sound Converter, GNOME System Monitor, GNOME Terminal, GNOME Tweak Tool, Totem, Epiphany, XChat, LibreOffice Calc, LibreOffice Draw, LibreOffice Base, LibreOffice Impress, or LibreOffice Writer.

If you can spare 10 minutes to write a three paragraph long description, and fill in the homepage URL I would be very grateful. GNOME Software will look all the more awesome for your contribution.

Just go to the shared document and fill in any details you know. Thanks!

Broken .desktop files

Do you maintain or have commit access or one of these applications:

  • echomixer
  • envy24control
  • hdspconf
  • hdspmixer
  • hwmixvolume
  • alsamixergui
  • brasero
  • camorama
  • cheese
  • clementine
  • cutecw
  • easytag
  • flumotion-admin
  • fmtools
  • gimmix
  • gmpc
  • gnaural
  • gnomad2
  • gnome-chord
  • gnome-scale
  • gnomebaker
  • gqradio
  • grip
  • gtk-recordmydesktop
  • gtkpod
  • gtkwhiteboard
  • guitarix
  • gxine
  • idjc
  • isomaster
  • gnome-istanbul
  • jack-rack
  • kover
  • ladi-system-tray
  • lash-panel
  • lingot
  • nxtvepg
  • oxine
  • pencil
  • pianobooster
  • picard
  • pitivi
  • qt-recordmydesktop
  • qv4l2
  • rhythmbox (bug filed)
  • seq24
  • sonata
  • soundconverter
  • sweep
  • themonospot-gtk
  • themonospot-qt
  • v4l2ucp
  • vkeybd

If your application is listed here, it will not be in the GNOME Software center as the .desktop file has AudioVideo but not Audio or Video. If you’ve got an app that plays music, you want to have at least “AudioVideo;Audio;” or if you’ve got an app that deals with audio and video you want at least “AudioVideo;Video;Audio;”. The freedesktop menu specification is a little odd in this regard.

If you fix this before 3.10.0 then it’ll magically work in the new software center.

GNOME Software Center and YOU!

Do you maintain an application that people use? Do you want people to be able to install it easily in the GNOME Software Center?

If both of those are true, please read the newly finalised AppData specification and ship one tiny extra file in your tarball. People will love you for doing it, and I’ll really appreciate it. Maybe post 3.10 we can do a GNOME Goal for all the core GNOME modules, but of course this applies to GNOME, KDE, XFCE and random standalone apps.

2000th ColorHug

This week we will hit a milestone we thought we might not ever reach – selling ColorHug device number 2000. We started making ColorHugs just 18 months ago and have come a long way from the first batch that was hand-built on a desk in our back bedroom. I started the project as a hobby to make some embedded hardware as it was something I enjoyed doing at University and hadn’t done for a while. I assured my wife we wouldn’t need to make more then 50. So imagine how we felt when we got over 800 responses to a single blog post. I only wrote it to check it was worth making that initial batch! So this hobby turned into a second job almost overnight that came with all the fun dealing with customer emails, legal issues and setting up a business that pays tax. Ania was not best pleased when our lovely guest room turned into our manufacturing department and my “hobby” had her screwing devices together on weekends, evenings and even on Boxing Day.

DSC_7276_01-sm

A lot has changed since that first batch.  From outsourcing the PCB fabrication and to occasionally recruiting my mum, dad and of course Ania in the manufacture, assembly, dispatch and administrative aspects of ColorHug. We finally have a new outside office – so after nearly two years we have our house back! And most importantly we have had a little girl, who keeps us very busy and thus has slowed the development of the ColorHug Spectro.

DSC_0318

Building an OpenHardware device has definitely been a worthwhile pursuit and something I believe in. We will have built and shipped 2000 devices all around the world, including issuing two lots of free gifts to update early adopters with the latest accessories and design improvements. We’ve also built a large community who are using ColorHugs all over the world for calibrating external screens and panels in domestic and commercial settings.

We still don’t make much profit on each unit and definitely wouldn’t recommend making calibration hardware as a get rich quick scheme, but we have enjoyed growing ColorHug and fostering the community that has built up around it. We’d like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who has helped make ColorHug a success – from those who’ve helped make the device through to those who contribute in the community by testing and reporting bugs.

Some interesting statistics from the last 18 months:

  • Total Sold: 1998
  • Number of Batches: 8
  • Typical number of jiffy bags ready to go at any time: 60
  • Number of returns: 8
  • Number of automated emails from PayPal: 2520
  • Number of emails Ania and I have sent (most semi-automated): 5087
  • Number of LiveCD updates: 9
  • Number of different countries sent to: 21
  • Amount of money spent on postage: £9,354

So, basically, we’re very humbled and grateful! Richard, Ania and baby Hughes.

 

AppData Proposal, a.k.a. How to make your application appear in the software center

This morning I wrote up this proposal. If you maintain an application that you think should be in the GNOME Software Center, I would appreciate your views. Thanks!

p.s. Don’t actually commit anything to your modules just yet, I want to finish the polishing and wording before asking people to write anything. For example, the format of the long description should probably be much more prescriptive.