Thomas Wood

A lot of blog posts about Fedora 12 recently. It’s been a while since I last tried Fedora, so I thought I’d try it out and post some of my thoughts.

Likes

• Sweet KMS enabled boot screen – very nice
• Yum is fast enough to be usable (but maybe that’s because of my quad core now?)
• Custom icons for Documents/Downloads/Music/Videos etc
• Installer re-assigned ownership attributes for old home directory. Very handy.
• Clearlooks is the default theme (not Nodoka)
• Control Center (Preferences) menu is no longer grouped by categories

Dislikes

• Notifications (what is that horrible massive black square on my screen)
• Package manager UI (often just too confusing, too animated, or too awkward)
• Bluetooth keyboard didn’t work in the final setup screens (setting up username etc…)
• Every other folder in Nautilus tells me I can share it using Personal File Sharing (well, at least $HOME and $HOME/Downloads – why would I want to share $HOME and why do I have to see this notice all the time?)
• Doesn’t remember my preferred language (en_GB)

All in all, looking good apart from the few niggles I’m sure will be fixed before release. If anyone knows whether there is a meta-package to install enough packages to allow GNOME development (e.g. including gcc, intltool, libtool, gtk-doc, etc), that would be awesome.

Update: I just found sudo yum install @gnome-devel @development-tools via the Jhbuild page. It’s a start, but doesn’t include everything needed to build GTK+ for example. Shame the package manager UI doesn’t make this more obvious.

Unfortunately, I’m not going to file bugs just yet, because these are just my first impressions, and I’m not yet a Fedora user!

Luis Villa let us know he was in London this week and asked if anyone was up for a beer (a trick question perhaps?). More than happy to oblige, we’re going to meet up at our traditional haunt of Ye Olde Cheshire Cheese and then go on for pizza. I’ve put up the wiki page to let us know if you’re coming. All GNOME hackers/contributers/hangers-on welcome.

We’ve been discussing the future of the Interface tab in the Appearance capplet, and we’d like to “fix” the default toolbar style before we consider any changes. It seems not many people are aware of what these styles actually look like, so to help I’ve done some screenshots:

Text Beside Icons (the proposed new default)

Text Below Icons (the current default)

Icons Only

Text Only

A trial switch to the text-beside-icons style is underway, so that we can test applications to make sure they work properly with this style. Discussion on any issues can be reported in bug 590143.

Personally, I think there are several advantages to the text-beside-icons mode:

* Increased hit area (fitts law) for important buttons
* Reduced vertical space usage (compared to text-below-icons)
* Reduced horizontal space usage in some applications (as compared to text-below-icons in e.g. Nautilus, Evolution)
* Aesthetically nicer than having text for every item

Hylke wrote about installing fonts in GNOME and how there isn’t an easy way to do this at the moment. Since his suggestion was so simple, I got out my editor and spent this evening hacking. It’s feature freeze tomorrow, so I’ve pushed the changes into master and any testing would be greatly appreciated!

There are probably a few tweaks to be made to padding, etc. Hopefully I can also work out how to get the word wrapping/scrolling they way it needs to be without resorting to fixed sizing (it’s not as simple as you might think).

Just a quick note to say another social is being organised in London for this Friday. Open to any GNOME hackers/contributors/hangers on. Sign up and details on the wiki page: http://live.gnome.org/LondonBeer/Version2.4

My gobject generator project I mentioned a while ago has been named “Turbine” (thanks to Charles for the suggestion). I’ve made a few more improvements and it’s now available in a GNOME git repository:

http://git.gnome.org/cgit/turbine/

git clone git://git.gnome.org/turbine

The new Moblin User Experience has been announced. Finally we can show people what we’ve been working on!

Check out the introduction video

There has been recent talk about GObject Generators, so I’m going to throw my own one into the mix. It’s based on Ross’ gobject.py, but given a fresh dose of GTK+ and auto completion love.

If you’d like to try it out, there is a git repository available:

git clone http://gnome.org/~thos/git/gobject-gen.git

I’d like to move it to GNOME git, but before I do it needs a decent project name. Does anyone have any suggestions? Something descriptive but unique, preferably with only 2 syllables.

Kudos to the Anjuta GObject generator for the auto completion idea. Also, before any one suggests it, I know about Vala but we’re not using it for this project, so it’s of no use.

In the office we have two white boards that where going rather underused. Last week I decided to rectify this by drawing FOSS propaganda on one of them. On the same day, Damien (of Shave fame) happened to show us all a new Vim command we hadn’t used before, so I suggested we start a Vim Command of the Day sheet on the other white board. We’ve taken this into the 21st century as well, so anyone can follow Damien’s encyclopedic knowledge on Vim through the magic of twitter: @vcotwdorso (short for, “vim command of the week day or so”, because Damien didn’t want to be restricted to updating it just once a day)

Does anyone know what’s happened to vim’s “comment” feature in Debian Lenny? It seems this feature is enabled (i.e. –version shows +comment) and the default string set, but it just doesn’t work. Does any one have any ideas?

Update: many thanks to Lubomir; the answer was that the ‘r’ and ‘o’ options where missing from formatoptions.