Category Archives: Uncategorized

Summer recipes

I just did a release of GNOME recipes in time for GUADEC.

While this is a development release, I think it may be time to declare this version (1.6) stable. Therefore, I encourage you to try it out and let me know if something doesn’t work.

Here is a quick look at the highlights in this release.

Inline editing

Inline editing of ingredients has been completed. We provide completions for both units and ingredients.

Error handling

And if something goes wrong, we try to be helpful by pointing out the erroneous entry and explaining the required format.


The printed form of recipes has seen several small improvements. Fields like cuisine and season are now included, and the ingredients list is properly aligned in columns.


All lists of recipes can now be sorted by recency or by name.

If you happen to be in Manchester this weekend, you can learn more about GNOME recipes by coming to our talk.

Rawhide sightings

I haven’t done a blog post about new stuff in GNOME for a while.

Many exciting things are getting advertised by their respective developers anyway, such as Builder or GNOME Todo or gnome-tweak-tool. So here is just a quick note about about a few new things that I am enjoying in GNOME shell in 3.25.

Translucent top bar

The shell top bar was conceived to visually merge with the bezel of the monitor, which is why it has always been mostly black. As many people have pointed out, one downside of this is that it makes the monitor appear smaller, when vertical space is already a scarce commodity. In 3.26, we are trying something new, and make the top bar translucent. To avoid odd visuals, we only do this if the background is actually visible underneath the top bar. In other words, we still have a black bar when there are maximized windows directly touching it.

I have to admit that I was skeptical when we discussed this change: it could be frustrating to move a window up towards that now seemingly available space, only to find the top bar turn solid as you touch it. But in actually using it, it is pleasant, and I like it very much.

Maximize animations

Last cycle, we introduced animations when application windows enter or leave the fullscreen state. In 3.26, we now also animate transition to and from maximized and half-tiled states. A small, but noticable bit of polish!

If you want to see these things for yourself and don’t want to wait until October, you can try them in Fedora rawhide (which will turn into Fedora 27 in the fall).

More things coming

The GNOME shell team around Florian Müllner has a some more nice things in the pipeline for GNOME 3.26 that are not quite ready for a screen cast yet. A great way to learn about them is to come to GUADEC in  Manchester, July 27 – August 3. See you there!

Fractional scaling goes east

When we introduced HiDPI support in GNOME a few years ago, we took the simplest possible approach that was feasible to implement with the infrastructure we had available at the time.

Some of the limitations:

  • You either get 1:1 or 2:1 scaling, nothing in between
  • The cut-off point that is somewhat arbitrarily chosen and you don’t get a say in it
  • In multi-monitor systems, all monitors share the same scale

Each of these limitations had technical reasons. For example, doing different scales per-monitor is hard to do as long as you are only using a single, big framebuffer for all of them. And allowing scale factors such as 1.5 leads to difficult questions about how to deal with windows that have a size like 640.5×480.5 pixels.

Over the years, we’ve removed the technical obstacles one-by-one, e.g. introduced per-monitor framebuffers. One of the last obstacles was the display configuration API that mutter exposes to the control-center display panel, which was closely modeled on XRANDR, and not suitable for per-monitor and non-integer scales. In the last cycle, we introduced a new, more suitable monitor configuration API, and the necessary support for it has just landed in the display panel.

With this, all of the hurdles have been cleared away, and we are finally ready to get serious about fractional scaling!

Yes, a hackfest!

Jonas and Marco happen to both be in Taipei in early June, so what better to do than to get together and spend some days hacking on fractional scaling support:

If you are a compositor developer (or plan on becoming one), or just generally interested in helping with this work, and are in the area, please check out the date and location by following the link. And, yes, this is a bit last-minute, but we still wanted to give others a chance to participate.

Recipes growing team

With the big push towards 1.0 now over, the development in GNOME recipes has moved to a more relaxed pace. But that doesn’t mean that nothing is happening! In fact, our team is growing, we will have two interns joining us this cycle, Ekta and Paxana.

While we are waiting for Ekta and Paxana to start working on the big projects for this cycle (sharing and unit conversion),  a number of smaller improvements have landed and will hopefully appear in a development release soon.

More recipes

We were somewhat successful in getting recipe contributions from the GNOME community.

Thanks to everybody who has contributed – keep it coming !

One consequence of this success is that we have too much data to ship with the application – the tarball for 1.0 was bigger than 100MB. To avoid this problem growing even further, the current development release downloads all recipe and image data at runtime, when needed. I’m very interested in feedback about how well that works.

More cuisines

Another consequence is that we now have so many cuisines represented that they don’t fit on one page anymore.

To address this, I’ve added an expander to show more cuisines.

Another improvement around cuisines is that we now offer all the cuisines that we know about to the cuisine combo box when you are editing recipes. A small step towards a user interface that adapts to your use of the application.

Inline editing

One of the findings of our testing session with Jakub and Tuomas at devconf was that creating a recipe was too fiddly, in particular the popover-heavy editing of the ingredients list.

To address this, we are moving to an inline editing approach for the ingredients list. To make this easier, I first refactored the ingredients list to be a separate widget which is now shared between the edit page and the details page (in a read-only mode).

Ekta is helping me with this.

Row reordering

Another outcome of our testing session was that we need to let the user reorder the ingredients list, which was not possible back in January. For 1.0, we added buttons to move a row up or down, but that was more of a stop-gap solution.

What we really want is to reorder rows by drag-and-drop,so I spent a bit of time recently to figure out drag-and-drop support for list boxes.

Temperature conversion

Last, but not least, we also added some preliminary support for unit conversion.

For now, we can display temperatures in Celsius or Fahrenheit. Currently, this gets determined by a setting, but as the next step, we are going to pick this up from the locale.

Paxana is working on this, as a warm-up for her internship project.

Meson considerations

A post with my GNOME release team hat on…

Meson is new and cool

A number of GNOME modules are switching to meson for 3.26. I myself was an early adopter for this: recipes has had meson build support since the beginning of the year, and after the 1.0 release, I’ve dropped autotools support on the master branch.

autotools are of course very familiar to most of us, and we know how to get most things done there. But it often isn’t pretty, and  using meson feels like a breath of fresh air. Others have been praising meson for its simplicity, ease of use and speed, so I am not going repeat that here.

Supported tools

jhbuild is our traditional build support tool, and it has well-working meson support for a while now. GNOME builder and flatpak-builder also both support meson and we include meson in the GNOME sdk for 3.24.

So, for developers, meson support is more or less there, and working well.

Transition woes

So, things are pretty awesome all around: we have a new build system, it is shiny and fast and supported. Sounds too good to be true. Whats the catch ?

One thing that meson does not do is building traditional ‘make dist’ style tarballs. The premise is that you can just build your software from a git tag or from a snapshot produced by git-archive.

While that is true, and maybe a direction we want to be going in for the future, there are plenty of build systems out there that expect you to provide a tarball or similar archive. That is true for Fedora’s koji, and it is also true for form in which we currently produce GNOME releases.

A GNOME release is essentially defined by a jhbuild module file (several of them, in fact) which refers to release tarballs for all of our modules, including checksums and sizes.  For core GNOME modules, these tarballs are generally put in place using a tool called ftpadmin. As I’ve recently found out, ftpadmin is a little picky. It expects the content in the tarball to be in a directory that’s named in module-version style and will error out if that is not the case.

Thankfully, git archive is up to the task. Here is what I did to produce a recent gnome-recipes release:

git tag -m 1.2.0 1.2.0
git archive --prefix gnome-recipes-1.2.0/ \
            -o gnome-recipes-1.2.0.tar.xz \

Some unsolved problems remain. For example, we have not decided on how to handle library documentation in the new meson world. The way this works with autotools is that the tarballs include generated docs, which get extracted and post-processed by some scripts before they end up on But git archive snapshots contain no generated documentation…  So far, no library that we host documentation for has made the jump to meson-only builds, so we still have some time to come up with a different solution.

Overall, I am really excited that we are embracing meson!

Update: My discussion of archives failed to consider git submodules. git-archive does not handle those, so my recommendation will not produce a working snapshot if you use submodules. See nautilus’ script for how to handle that.

GTK+ happenings

This will be a longer post summarizing some of the discussions and decisions at the recent GTK+ hackfest in London.

I’ve just released GTK+ 3.90, as a milestone on our way towards GTK+ 4. This post should explain not just what is or isn’t in that release, but also where we are on the journey towards GTK+ 4, and what changes are still in the pipeline.

The reason for doing a 3.90 release now and not just another 3.89.x milestone is that we want to encourage experimental ports of some GTK+ 3 applications at this point, to gather feedback.

If you want to do this for your application, you should be aware that we are not promising more than 6 month API stability yet. There are still a number of unfinished transitions and fundamental changes (such as dropping subwindows, or moving container APIs to GtkWidget) that can and will affect application APIs before GTK+ 4.

I am willing to do a few 3.90.x snapshots if there is interest, but you should also be prepared to keep your application building against GTK+ 3, since 3.90 may not be widely available in distributions.

Hackfest happenings

We had a 3 productive days in London last week. The hackfest was a bit different from previous GTK+ get-togethers since we had a bigger and more diverse audience, which means that we had less down-in-the-details discussion about GTK+ internals.

Instead, some of us spent time discussion portals, Flatpak, build services and other things – but I will focus on the GTK+ parts in this post.

The GTK+ discussion was sometimes a bit higher-level, with topics like graphics pipelines and how we use them in GSK, or constraints and how they can fit into the GTK+ layout machinery.

I’ve personally enjoyed this change of pace quite a bit, and hope we can repeat this style of event in the future.

The details: GSK

We spent a while reviewing how far we have come with rebasing the GTK+ rendering onto GSK (and thus, GL / Vulkan). I won’t go into excessive details here, but we have both a Vulkan and a GL renderer for GSK.

The Vulkan renderer has shader implementations for many of the performance-relevant elements of CSS that make up GTK+ widgets. One major omission is that we still don’t handle text natively and fall back to cairo rendering and texture upload for it. We decided to look at cogl-pango and lift the necessary texture atlas and pango renderer from there, as far as possible.

The GL renderer is much less complete, since Benjamin has focused on implementing things on the Vulkan side at first. The plan here is to finish the Vulkan side first and then port things over to GL. One difference between the backends that we discussed at some length is that while changing pipelines is cheap with Vulkan, that may not be the case on the GL side, so we may need an optimizing pass over the render node tree to minimize state changes.

The details: constraints

Emmanuele gave a demo of Emeus, which is his implementation of constraints-based layout for GTK+. This demo left me feeling quite positive – everybody seems to be moving in the direction of constraints-based layout.

Emeus also supports Apple’s shorthand notation for constraints, so it should be familiar to many people who don’t have experience with GTK+’s nested boxes model. If we can integrate this in time for GTK+ 4, it could make a real difference for how GTK+ applications are designed and implemented.

In the discussion after the demo, we touched on questions of how we could possibly reimplement existing GTK+ containers in terms of constraints, and how we can take even more advantage of constraints by making Emeus composable.

Of course, there are questions of how far this approach will scale – could you put all of gtk-widget-factory into a single system of constraints and solve it while resizing the window ? We will find out…

The details: input

One of the reasons why we are moving to GL-based rendering is that we want to enable more pervasive animations in many places. One example that we’ve discussed is animating the showing and hiding of list or grid elements in a filtered list box or flow box. Doing this smoothly at 60 frames per second requires that we can move and transform elements without causing full relayouts, which in turn means that we to separate positions from sizes, which is only practical in a world without subwindows.

Therefore, one of the milestones on our journey towards GTK+ 4 is to move event handling away from using subwindows for routing input events to their target. Once we have taken this step, it will also be possible to take transformations into account.

Carlos just posted a branch that is taking the first steps in this direction.

The details: children, nodes and gadgets

I’ve already talked about Emeus and constraints, so I won’t repeat that here. But there are some other changes in the way GTK+ widgets work that are worth mentioning here.

We are moving away from GtkContainer as the parent class for container. Instead we now allow any widget to have children. The APIs for this are more DOM-like than GtkContainer: gtk_widget_get_first_child, gtk_widget_get_last_child, gtk_widget_get_next_sibling, gtk_widget_get_prev_sibling.

In GTK+ 3.20 and afterwards, we introduced gadgets as internal construct that allowed us to clean up our widget’s adherence to the CSS box model. This was always meant as a stop-gap solution for pre-existing widgets that were just too complicated to fit the CSS box model well. Now that any widget can have children, we have begun to replace some of these gadgets with regular widgets.

For example, GtkSwitch now has three child widgets: the slider and two labels.


We’ve had a successful hackfest and GTK+ 4 development is on track, with 3.90 as a visible milestone. Try it out!

Recipes 1.0

Recipes 1.0 is here, in time for GNOME 3.24 next week. You can get it here:

A flatpak is available here:

and can be installed with

flatpak install

Thanks to everybody who helped us to reach this point by contributing recipes, sending patches, translations or bug reports!


Recipes looks pretty good in GNOME Software already, but one thing is missing: No documentation costs us a perfect rating. Thankfully, Paul Cutler has shown up and started to fill this gap, so we can get the last icon turned blue with the next release.

Since one of the goals of Recipes is to be an exemplaric Flatpak app, I took this opportunity to investigate how we can handle documentation for sandboxed applications.

One option is to just put all the docs on the web and launch a web browser, but that feels a bit like cheating. Another option is to export all the documentation files from the sandbox and launch the host help browser on it. But this would require us to recursively export an entire directory full of possibly malicious content – so far, we’ve been careful to only export individual, known files like the desktop file or the app icon.

Therefore, we decided that we should instead ship a help browser in the GNOME runtime and launch it inside the sandbox. This turns out to work reasonably well, and will be used by more GNOME apps in the near future.


Apart from this ongoing work on documentation, a number of bug fixes and small improvements have found there way into the 1.0 release. For example, you can now find recipes by searching for the chef by name. And we ask for confirmation if you are about to close the window with unsaved changes.

Some of these changes were contributed by prospective Outreachy interns.


I have mentioned it before, you can find some information about our future plans for recipes here:

Your help is more than welcome!

A journey, with recipes

This month, we will release GNOME 3.24, and alongside, GNOME recipes will have its 1.0 release.

It has been quite a journey from just an idea at GUADEC last August to the application that we have now.

To the finish line

Since my last update, we have focused on completing our 1.0 goals. The last thing that we needed was to get enough contributed recipes to replace all the test data with actual content. And we’ve made it, thanks to the cooks in the GNOME community, we have plenty of great recipes now:

A few small features have still made their way in, despite the focus on polish. One thing I’ve played with is making appstream data useful inside the application itself, for showing ‘What’s New’ style information:

The timer support in cooking mode has seen quite a bit of improvement and polish.

I’ve also picked up my earlier experiment again, and built Recipes on OS X. This time, I got far enough to produce a dmg image:

A useful by-product of this effort was a number of bug fixes for the GTK+ Quartz backend, such as working fullscreen and window functions.

What next ?

1.0 will not be the end of the road for Recipes. There’s a number of exciting features on the post-1.0 roadmap.

For the next leg of the journey, we will welcome some Outreachy interns who will help us to add useful functionality, from unit conversion to shopping list export.

Recipes by mail

Since I last wrote about GNOME recipes, we’ve mainly focused on completing our feature set for 3.24.

Todays 0.12.0 release brings us very close to covering all the goals we’ve set ourselves when we started working on recipes: We have a  fullscreen cooking mode

and recipes and shopping lists can be shared by email

Since the Share button has replaced the Export button, contributing your recipes is now easier too: Just choose the “Contribute” option and send the recipe to the new mailing list.

While working on this, it suddenly dawned on my why I may have seen some recipe contributions in bugzilla that where missing attachments: bugzilla has a limit for the sizes of attachments it allows, and recipes with photos may hit this limit.

So, if you’ve tried to contributed a recipe via bugzilla, and ran into this problem, please send your recipe to instead.

Presentation woes

My flatpak presentation at ran into some technical difficulties when the beamer system failed halfway through. I couldn’t show the second half of my slides, and had to improvise a bit. If you were in the room, I hope it wasn’t too incomprehensible.

You can see what you missed here:

And here is a quick recording of the demo I would have given at the end of my talk: