Fedora Workstation development update – Artificial Intelligence edition

Posted on by

There are times when you feel your making no progress and there are other times when things feel like they are landing in quick succession. Luckily this definitely is the second when a lot of our long term efforts are finally coming over the finish line. As many of you probably know our priorities tend to be driven by a combination of what our RHEL Workstation customers need, what our hardware partners are doing and what is needed for Fedora Workstation to succeed. We also try to be good upstream partners and do patch reviews and participate where we can in working on upstream standards, especially those of course of concern to our RHEL Workstation and Server users. So when all those things align we are at our most productive and that seems to be what is happening now. Everything below is features in flight that will at the latest land in Fedora Workstation 41.

Artificial Intelligence

Granite LLM

IBM Granite LLM models usher in a new era of open source AI.


One of the areas of great importance to Red Hat currently is working on enabling our customers and users to take advantage of the advances in Artificial Intelligence. We do this in a lot of interesting ways like our recently announced work with IBM to release the high quality Granite AI models under terms that make them the most open major vendor AI models according to the Stanford Foundation Model Transparency Index , but not only are we releasing the full LLM source code, we are also creating a project to make modifying and teaching the LLM a lot easier through a project we call Instructlab. Instructlab is enabling almost anyone to quickly download a Granite LLM model and start teaching it specific things relevant to you or your organization. This put you in control of the AI and what it knows and can do as opposed to being demoted to a pure consumer.

And it is not just Granite, we are ensuring other other major AI projects will work with Fedora too, like Meta’s popular Llama LLM. And a big step for that is how Tom Rix has been working on bringing in AMD accelerated support (ROCm) for PyTorch to Fedora. PyTorch is an optimized tensor library for deep learning using GPUs and CPUs. The long term goal is that you should be able to just install PyTorch on Fedora and have it work hardware accelerated with any of the 3 major GPU vendors chipsets.

NVIDIA in Fedora
Fedora Workstation
So the clear market leader at the moment for powering AI workloads in NVIDIA so I am also happy to let you know about two updates we are working on that will make you life better on Fedora when using NVIDIA GPUs, be that for graphics or for compute or Artificial Intelligence. So for the longest time we have had easy install of the NVIDIA driver through GNOME Software in Fedora Workstation, unfortunately this setup never dealt with what is now the default usecase, which is using it with a system that has secure boot enabled. So the driver install was dropped from GNOME Software in our most recent release as the only way for people to get it working was through using mokutils on the command line, but the UI didn’t tell you that. Well we of course realize that sending people back to the command line to get this driver installed is highly unfortunate so Milan Crha has been working together with Alan Day and Jakub Steiner to come up with a streamlined user experience in GNOME Software to let you install the binary NVIDIA driver and provide you with an integrated graphical user interface help to sign the kernel module for use with secure boot. This is a bit different than what we for instance are doing in RHEL, where we are working with NVIDIA to provide pre-signed kernel modules, but that is a lot harder to do in Fedora due to the rapidly updating kernel versions and which most Fedora users appreciate as a big plus. So instead what we are for opting in Fedora is as I said to make it simple for you to self-sign the kernel module for use with secure boot. We are currently looking at when we can make this feature available, but no later than Fedora Workstation 41 for sure.

Toolbx getting top notch NVIDIA integration

Toolbx

Container Toolbx enables developers quick and easy access to their favorite development platforms


Toolbx, our incredible developer focused containers tool, is going from strength to strength these days with the rewrite from the old shell scripts to Go starting to pay dividends. The next major feature that we are closing in on is full NVIDIA driver support with Toolbx. As most of you know Toolbx is our developer container solution which makes it super simple to set up development containers with specific versions of Fedora or RHEL or many other distributions. Debarshi Ray has been working on implementing support for the official NVIDIA container device interface module which should enable us to provide full NVIDIA and CUDA support for Toolbx containers. This should provide reliable NVIDIA driver support going forward and Debarshi is currently testing various AI related container images to ensure they run smoothly on the new setup.

We are also hoping the packaging fixes to subscription manager will land soon as that will make using RHEL containers on Fedora a lot smoother. While this feature basically already works as outlined here we do hope to make it even more streamlined going forward.

Open Source NVIDIA support
Of course being Red Hat we haven’t forgotten about open source here, you probably heard about Nova our new Rust based upstream kernel driver for NVIDIA hardware which will provided optimized support for the hardware supported by NVIDIAs firmware (basically all newer ones) and accelerate Vulkan through the NVK module and provide OpenGL through Zink. That effort is still quite early days, but there is some really cool developments happening around Nova that I am not at liberty to share yet, but I hope to be able to talk about those soon.

High Dynamic Range (HDR)
Jonas Ådahl after completing the remote access work for GNOME under Wayland has moved his focus to help land the HDR support in mutter and GNOME Shell. He recently finished rebasing his HDR patches onto a wip merge request from
Georges Stavracas which ported gnome-shell to using paint nodes,

So the HDR enablement in mutter and GNOME shell is now a set of 3 patches.

With this the work is mostly done, what is left is avoiding over exposure of the cursor, and inhibiting direct scanout.

We also hope to help finalize the upstream Wayland specs soon so that everyone can implement this and know the protocols are stable and final.

DRM leasing – VR Headsets
VR Googles
The most common usecase for DRM leasing is VR headsets, but it is also a useful feature for things like video walls. José Expósito is working on finalizing a patch for it using the Wayland protocol adopted by KDE and others. We where somewhat hesitant to go down this route as we felt a portal would have been a better approach, especially as a lot of our experienced X.org developers are worried that Wayland is in the process of replicating one of the core issues with X through the unmanageable plethora of Wayland protocols that is being pushed. That said, the DRM leasing stuff was not a hill worth dying on here, getting this feature out to our users in a way they could quickly use was more critical, so DRM leasing will land soon through this merge request.

Explicit sync
Another effort that we have put a lot of effort into together with our colleagues at NVIDIA is landing support for what is called explicit sync into the Linux kernel and the graphics drivers.The linux graphics stack was up to this point using something called implicit sync, but the NVIDIA drivers did not work well with that and thus people where experiencing ‘blinking’ applications under Wayland. So we worked with NVIDIA and have landed the basic support in the kernel and in GNOME and thus once the 555 release of the NVIDIA driver is out we hope the ‘blinking’ issues are fully resolved for your display. There has been some online discussion about potential performance gains from this change too, across all graphics drivers, but the reality of this is somewhat uncertain or at least it is still unclear if there will be real world measurable gains from adding explicit sync. I heard knowledgeable people argue both sides with some saying there should be visible performance gains while others say the potential gains will be so specific that unless you write a test to benchmark it explicitly you will not be able to detect a difference. But what is beyond doubt is that this will make using the NVIDIA stack with Wayland a lot better a that is a worthwhile goal in itself. The one item we are still working on is integrating the PipeWire support for explicit sync into our stack, because without it you might have the same flickering issues with PipeWire streams on top of the NVIDIA driver that you have up to now seen on your screen. So for instance if you are using PipeWire for screen capture it might look fine on screen with the fixes already merged, but the captured video has flickering. Wim Taymans landed some initial support in PipeWire already so now Michel Dänzer is working on implementing the needed bits for PipeWire in mutter. At the same time Wim is working on ensuring we have a testing client available to verify the compositor support. Once everything has landed in mutter and we been able to verify that it works with the sample client we will need to add support to client applications interacting with PipeWire, like Firefox, Chrome, OBS Studio and GNOME-remote-desktop.

Fedora Workstation 40 – what are we working on

Posted on by
So Fedora Workstation 40 Beta has just come out so I thought I share a bit about some of the things we are working on for Fedora Workstation currently and also major changes coming in from the community.

Flatpak

Flatpaks has been a key part of our strategy for desktop applications for a while now and we are working on a multitude of things to make Flatpaks an even stronger technology going forward. Christian Hergert is working on figuring out how applications that require system daemons will work with Flatpaks, using his own Sysprof project as the proof of concept application. The general idea here is to rely on the work that has happened in SystemD around sysext/confext/portablectl trying to figure out who we can get a system service installed from a Flatpak and the necessary bits wired up properly. The other part of this work, figuring out how to give applications permissions that today is handled with udev rules, that is being worked on by Hubert Figuière based on earlier work by Georges Stavracas on behalf of the GNOME Foundation thanks to the sponsorship from the Sovereign Tech Fund. So hopefully we will get both of these two important issues resolved soon. Kalev Lember is working on polishing up the Flatpak support in Foreman (and Satellite) to ensure there are good tools for managing Flatpaks when you have a fleet of systems you manage, building on the work of Stephan Bergman. Finally Jan Horak and Jan Grulich is working hard on polishing up the experience of using Firefox from a fully sandboxed Flatpak. This work is mainly about working with the upstream community to get some needed portals over the finish line and polish up some UI issues in Firefox, like this one.

Toolbx

Toolbx, our project for handling developer containers, is picking up pace with Debarshi Ray currently working on getting full NVIDIA binary driver support for the containers. One of our main goals for Toolbx atm is making it a great tool for AI development and thus getting the NVIDIA & CUDA support squared of is critical. Debarshi has also spent quite a lot of time cleaning up the Toolbx website, providing easier access to and updating the documentation there. We are also moving to use the new Ptyxis (formerly Prompt) terminal application created by Christian Hergert, in Fedora Workstation 40. This both gives us a great GTK4 terminal, but we also believe we will be able to further integrate Toolbx and Ptyxis going forward, creating an even better user experience.

Nova

So as you probably know, we have been the core maintainers of the Nouveau project for years, keeping this open source upstream NVIDIA GPU driver alive. We plan on keep doing that, but the opportunities offered by the availability of the new GSP firmware for NVIDIA hardware means we should now be able to offer a full featured and performant driver. But co-hosting both the old and the new way of doing things in the same upstream kernel driver has turned out to be counter productive, so we are now looking to split the driver in two. For older pre-GSP NVIDIA hardware we will keep the old Nouveau driver around as is. For GSP based hardware we are launching a new driver called Nova. It is important to note here that Nova is thus not a competitor to Nouveau, but a continuation of it. The idea is that the new driver will be primarily written in Rust, based on work already done in the community, we are also evaluating if some of the existing Nouveau code should be copied into the new driver since we already spent quite a bit of time trying to integrate GSP there. Worst case scenario, if we can’t reuse code, we use the lessons learned from Nouveau with GSP to implement the support in Nova more quickly. Contributing to this effort from our team at Red Hat is Danilo Krummrich, Dave Airlie, Lyude Paul, Abdiel Janulgue and Phillip Stanner.

Explicit Sync and VRR

Another exciting development that has been a priority for us is explicit sync, which is critical for especially the NVidia driver, but which might also provide performance improvements for other GPU architectures going forward. So a big thank you to Michel Dänzer , Olivier Fourdan, Carlos Garnacho; and Nvidia folks, Simon Ser and the rest of community for working on this. This work has just finshed upstream so we will look at backporting it into Fedora Workstaton 40. Another major Fedora Workstation 40 feature is experimental support for Variable Refresh Rate or VRR in GNOME Shell. The feature was mostly developed by community member Dor Askayo, but Jonas Ådahl, Michel Dänzer, Carlos Garnacho and Sebastian Wick have all contributed with code reviews and fixes. In Fedora Workstation 40 you need to enable it using the command

gsettings set org.gnome.mutter experimental-features "['variable-refresh-rate']"

PipeWire

Already covered PipeWire in my post a week ago, but to quickly summarize here too. Using PipeWire for video handling is now finally getting to the stage where it is actually happening, both Firefox and OBS Studio now comes with PipeWire support and hopefully we can also get Chromium and Chrome to start taking a serious look at merging the patches for this soon. Whats more Wim spent time fixing Firewire FFADO bugs, so hopefully for our pro-audio community users this makes their Firewire equipment fully usable and performant with PipeWire. Wim did point out when I spoke to him though that the FFADO drivers had obviously never had any other consumer than JACK, so when he tried to allow for more functionality the drivers quickly broke down, so Wim has limited the featureset of the PipeWire FFADO module to be an exact match of how these drivers where being used by JACK. If the upstream kernel maintainer is able to fix the issues found by Wim then we could look at providing a more full feature set. In Fedora Workstation 40 the de-duplication support for v4l vs libcamera devices should work as soon as we update Wireplumber to the new 0.5 release.

To hear more about PipeWire and the latest developments be sure to check out this interview with Wim Taymans by the good folks over at Destination Linux.

Remote Desktop

Another major feature landing in Fedora Workstation 40 that Jonas Ådahl and Ray Strode has spent a lot of effort on is finalizing the remote desktop support for GNOME on Wayland. So there has been support for remote connections for already logged in sessions already, but with these updates you can do the login remotely too and thus the session do not need to be started already on the remote machine. This work will also enable 3rd party solutions to do remote logins on Wayland systems, so while I am not at liberty to mention names, be on the lookout for more 3rd party Wayland remoting software becoming available this year.

This work is also important to help Anaconda with its Wayland transition as remote graphical install is an important feature there. So what you should see there is Anaconda using GNOME Kiosk mode and the GNOME remote support to handle this going forward and thus enabling Wayland native Anaconda.

HDR

Another feature we been working on for a long time is HDR, or High Dynamic Range. We wanted to do it properly and also needed to work with a wide range of partners in the industry to make this happen. So over the last year we been contributing to improve various standards around color handling and acceleration to prepare the ground, work on and contribute to key libraries needed to for instance gather the needed information from GPUs and screens. Things are coming together now and Jonas Ådahl and Sebastian Wick are now going to focus on getting Mutter HDR capable, once that work is done we are by no means finished, but it should put us close to at least be able to start running some simple usecases (like some fullscreen applications) while we work out the finer points to get great support for running SDR and HDR applications side by side for instance.

PyTorch

We want to make Fedora Workstation a great place to do AI development and testing. First step in that effort is packaging up PyTorch and making sure it can have working hardware acceleration out of the box. Tom Rix has been leading that effort on our end and you will see the first fruits of that labor in Fedora Workstation 40 where PyTorch should work with GPU acceleration on AMD hardware (ROCm) out of the box. We hope and expect to be able to provide the same for NVIDIA and Intel graphics eventually too, but this is definitely a step by step effort.

PipeWire camera handling is now happening!

Posted on by

We hit a major milestones this week with the long worked on adoption of PipeWire Camera support finally starting to land!

Not long ago Firefox was released with experimental PipeWire camera support thanks to the great work by Jan Grulich.

Then this week OBS Studio shipped with PipeWire camera support thanks to the great work of Georges Stavracas, who cleaned up the patches and pushed to get them merged based on earlier work by himself, Wim Taymans and Colulmbarius. This means we now have two major applications out there that can use PipeWire for camera handling and thus two applications whose video streams that can be interacted with through patchbay applications like Helvum and qpwgraph.
These applications are important and central enough that having them use PipeWire are in itself useful, but they will now also provide two examples of how to do it for application developers looking at how to add PipeWire camera support to their own applications; there is no better documentation than working code.

The PipeWire support is also paired with camera portal support. The use of the portal also means we are getting closer to being able to fully sandbox media applications in Flatpaks which is an important goal in itself. Which reminds me, to test out the new PipeWire support be sure to grab the official OBS Studio Flatpak from Flathub.

PipeWire camera handling with OBS Studio, Firefox and Helvum.

PipeWire camera handling with OBS Studio, Firefox and Helvum.


Let me explain what is going on in the screenshot above as it is a lot. First of all you see Helvum there on the right showning all the connections made through PipeWire, both the audio and in yellow, the video. So you can see how my Logitech BRIO camera is feeding a camera video stream into both OBS Studio and Firefox. You also see my Magewell HDMI capture card feeding a video stream into OBS Studio and finally gnome-shell providing a screen capture feed that is being fed into OBS Studio. On the left you see on the top Firefox running their WebRTC test app capturing my video then just below that you see the OBS Studio image with the direct camera feed on the top left corner, the screencast of Firefox just below it and finally the ‘no signal’ image is from my HDMI capture card since I had no HDMI device connected to it as I was testing this.

For those wondering work is also underway to bring this into Chromium and Google Chrome browsers where Michael Olbrich from Pengutronix has been pushing to get patches written and merged, he did a talk about this work at FOSDEM last year as you can see from these slides with this patch being the last step to get this working there too.

The move to PipeWire also prepared us for the new generation of MIPI cameras being rolled out in new laptops and helps push work on supporting those cameras towards libcamera, the new library for dealing with the new generation of complex cameras. This of course ties well into the work that Hans de Goede and Kate Hsuan has been doing recently, along with Bryan O’Donoghue from Linaro, on providing an open source driver for MIPI cameras and of course the incredible work by Laurent Pinchart and Kieran Bingham from Ideas on board on libcamera itself.

The PipeWire support is of course fresh and I am sure we will find bugs and corner cases that needs fixing as more people test out the functionality in both Firefox and OBS Studio and there are some interface annoyances we are working to resolve. For instance since PipeWire support both V4L and libcamera as a backend you do atm get double entries in your selection dialogs for most of your cameras. Wireplumber has implemented de-deplucation code which will ensure only the libcamera listing will show for cameras supported by both v4l and libcamera, but is only part of the development version of Wireplumber and thus it will land in Fedora Workstation 40, so until that is out you will have to deal with the duplicate options.

Camera selection dialog

Camera selection dialog


We are also trying to figure out how to better deal with infraread cameras that are part of many modern webcams. Obviously you usually do not want to use an IR camera for your video calls, so we need to figure out the best way to identify them and ensure they are clearly marked and not used by default.

Another recent good PipeWire new tidbit that became available with the PipeWire 1.0.4 release PipeWire maintainer Wim Taymans also fixed up the FireWire FFADO support. The FFADO support had been in there for some time, but after seeing Venn Stone do some thorough tests and find issues we decided it was time to bite the bullet and buy some second hand Firewire hardware for Wim to be able to test and verify himself.

Focusrite firewire device

Focusrite firewire device

.
Once the Focusrite device I bought landed at Wims house he got to work and cleaned up the FFADO support and make it both work and be performant.
For those unaware FFADO is a way to use Firewire devices without going through ALSA and is popular among pro-audio folks because it gives lower latencies. Firewire is of course a relatively old technology at this point, but the audio equipment is still great and many audio engineers have a lot of these devices, so with this fixed you can plop a Firewire PCI card into your PC and suddenly all those old Firewire devices gets a new lease on life on your Linux system. And you can buy these devices on places like ebay or facebook marketplace for a fraction of their original cost. In some sense this demonstrates the same strength of PipeWire as the libcamera support, in the libcamera case it allows Linux applications a way to smoothly transtion to a new generation of hardware and in this Firewire case it allows Linux applications to keep using older hardware with new applications.

So all in all its been a great few weeks for PipeWire and for Linux Audio AND Video, and if you are an application maintainer be sure to look at how you can add PipeWire camera support to your application and of course get that application packaged up as a Flatpak for people using Fedora Workstation and other distributions to consume.

Fedora Workstation 39 and beyond

Posted on by

I have not been so active for a while with writing these Fedora Workstation updates and part of the reason was that I felt I was beginning to repeat myself a lot, which I partly felt was a side effect of writing them so often, but with some time now since my last update I felt that time was ripe again. So what are some of the things we have been working on and what are our main targets going forward? This is not a exhaustive list, but hopefully items you find interesting. Apologize for weird sentences and potential spelling mistakes, but it ended up a a long post and when you read your own words over for the Nth time you start going blind to issues :)

PipeWire

PipeWire 1.0 is available! PipeWire keeps the Linux Multimedia revolution rolling[/caption]So lets start with one of your favorite topics, PipeWire. As you probably know PipeWire 1.0 is now out and I feel it is a project we definitely succeeded with, so big kudos to Wim Taymans for leading this effort. I think the fact that we got both the creator of JACK, Paul Davis and the creator of PulseAudio Lennart Poettering to endorse it means our goal of unifying the Linux audio landscape is being met. I include their endorsement comments from the PipeWire 1.0 release announcement here :

“PipeWire represents the next evolution of audio handling for Linux, taking
the best of both pro-audio (JACK) and desktop audio servers (PulseAudio) and
linking them into a single, seamless, powerful new system.”
– Paul Davis, JACK and Ardour author

“PipeWire is a worthy successor to PulseAudio, providing a feature set
closer to how modern audio hardware works, and with a security model
with today’s application concepts in mind. Version 1.0 marks a
major milestone in completing the adoption of PipeWire in the standard
set of Linux subsystems. Congratulations to the team!”
– Lennart Poettering, Pulseaudio and systemd author

So for new readers, PipeWire is a audio and video server we created for Fedora Workstation to replace PulseAudio for consumer audio, JACK for pro-audio and add similar functionality for video to your linux operating system. So instead of having to deal with two different sound server architectures users now just have to deal with one and at the same time they get the same advantages for video handling. Since PipeWire implemented both the PulseAudio API and the JACK API it is a drop in replacement for both of them without needing any changes to the audio applications built for those two sound servers. Wim Taymans alongside the amazing community that has grown around the project has been hard at work maturing PipeWire and adding any missing feature they could find that blocked anyone from moving to it from either PulseAudio and JACK. Wims personal focus recently has been on an IRQ based ALSA driver for PipeWire to be able to provide 100% performance parity with the old JACK server. So while a lot of Pro-audio users felt that PipeWire’s latency was already good enough, this work by Wim shaves of the last few milliseconds to reach the same level of latency as JACK itself had.

In parallel with the work on PipeWire the community and especially Collabora has been hard at work on the new 0.5 release of WirePlumber, the session manager which handles all policy issues for PipeWire. I know people often get a little confused about PipeWire vs WirePlumber, but think of it like this: PipeWire provides you the ability to output audio through a connected speaker, through a bluetooth headset, through an HDMI connection and so on, but it doesn’t provide any ‘smarts’ for how that happens. The smarts are instead provided by WirePlumber which then contains policies to decide where to route your audio or video, either based on user choice or through preset policies making the right choices automatically, like if you disconnect your USB speaker it will move the audio to your internal speaker instead. Anyway, WirePlumber 0.5 will be a major step forward for WirePlumber moving from using lua scripts for configuration to instead using JSON for configuration while retaining lua for scripting. This has many advantages, but I point you to this excellent blog post by Collabora’s Ashok Sidipotu for the details. Ashok got further details about WirePlumber 0.5 that you can find here.

With PipeWire 1.0 out the door I feel we are very close to reaching one of our initial goals with PipeWire, to remove the need for custom pro-audio distributions like Fedora JAM or Ubuntu Studio, and instead just let audio folks be able to use the same great Fedora Workstation as the rest of the world. With 1.0 done Wim plans next to look a bit at things like configuration tools and similar used by pro-audio folks and also dive into the Flatpak portal needs of pro-audio applications more, to ensure that Flatpaks + PipeWire is the future of pro-audio.

On the video handling side its been a little slow going since there applications need to be ported from relying directly on v4l. Jan Grulich has been working with our friends at Mozilla and Google to get PipeWire camera handling support into Firefox and Google Chrome. At the moment it looks like the Firefox support will land first, in fact Jan has set up a COPR that lets you try it out here. For tracking the upstream work in WebRTC to add PipeWire support Jan set up this tracker bug. Getting the web browsers to use PipeWire is important both to enable the advanced video routing capabilities of PipeWire, but it will also provide applications the ability to use libcamera which is a needed for new modern MIPI cameras to work properly under Linux.

Another important application to get PipeWire camera support into is OBS Studio and the great thing is that community member Georges Stavracas is working on getting the PipeWire patches merged into OBS Studio, hopefully in time for their planned release early next year. You can track Georges work in this pull request.

For more information about PipeWire 1.0 I recommend our interview with Wim Taymans in Fedora Magazine and also the interview with Wim on Linux Unplugged podcast.

HDR
HDRHDR, or High Dynamic Range, is another major effort for us. HDR is a technology I think many of you have become familiar with due to it becoming quite common in TVs these days. It basically provides for greatly increased color depth and luminescence on your screen. This is a change that entails a lot of changes through the stack, because when you introduce into an existing ecosystem like the Linux desktop you have to figure out how to combine both new HDR capable applications and content and old non-HDR applications and content. Sebastian Wick, Jonas Ådahl, Oliver Fourdan, Michel Daenzer and more on the team has been working with other members of the ecosystem from Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, Collabora and more to pick and define the standards and protocols needed in this space. A lot of design work was done early in the year so we been quite focused on implementation work across the drivers, Wayland, Mesa, GStreamer, Mutter, GTK+ and more. Some of the more basic scenarios, like running a fullscreen HDR application is close to be ready, while we are still working hard on getting all the needed pieces together for the more complex scenarios like running SDR and HDR windows composited together on your desktop. So getting for instance full screen games to run in HDR mode with Steam should happen shortly, but the windowed support will probably land closer to summer next year.

Wayland remoting
One feature we been also spending a lot of time on is enabling remote logins to a Wayland desktop. You have been able to share your screen under Wayland more or less from day one, but it required your desktop session to be already active. But lets say you wanted to access your Wayland desktop running on a headless system you been out of luck so far and had to rely on the old X session instead. So putting in place all the pieces for this has been quite an undertaking with work having been done on PipeWire, on Wayland portals, gnome remote desktop daemon, libei; the new input emulation library, gdm and more. The pieces needed are finally falling into place and we expect to have everything needed landed in time for GNOME 46. This support is currently done using a private GNOME API, but a vendor less API is being worked on to replace it.

As a sidenote here not directly related to desktop remoting, but libei has also enabled us to bring xtest support to XWayland which was important for various applications including Valves gamescope.

NVIDIA drivers
One area we keep investing in is improving the state of NVIDIA support on Linux. This comes both in the form of being the main company backing the continued development of the Nouveau graphics driver. So the challenge with Nouveau is that for the longest while it offered next to no hardware acceleration for 3D graphics. The reason for this was that the firmware that NVIDIA provided for Nouveau to use didn’t expose that functionality and since recent generations of NVIDIA cards only works with firmware signed by NVIDIA this left us stuck. So Nouveau was a good tool for doing an initial install of a system, but if you where doing any kind of serious 3D acceleration, including playing games, then you would need to install the NVIDIA binary driver. So in the last year that landscape around that has changed drastically, with the release of the new out-of-tree open source driver from NVIDIA. Alongside that driver a new firmware has also been made available , one that do provide full support for hardware acceleration.
Let me quickly inject a quick explanation of out-of-tree versus in-tree drivers here. An in-tree driver is basically a kernel driver for a piece of hardware that has been merged into the official Linux kernel from Linus Torvalds and is thus being maintained as part of the official Linux kernel releases. This ensures that the driver integrates well with the rest of the Linux kernel and that it gets updated in sync with the rest of the Linux kernel. So Nouveau is an in-tree kernel driver which also integrates with the rest of the open source graphics stack, like Mesa. The new NVIDIA open source driver is an out-of-tree driver which ships as a separate source code release on its own schedule, but of course NVIDIA works to keeps it working with the upstream kernel releases (which is a lot of work of course and thus considered a major downside to being an out of tree driver).

As of the time of writing this blog post NVIDIAs out-of-tree kernel driver and firmware is still a work in progress for display usercases, but that is changing with NVIDIA exposing more and more display features in the driver (and the firmware) with each new release they do. But if you saw the original announcement of the new open source driver from NVIDIA and have been wondering why no distribution relies on it yet, this is why. So what does this mean for Nouveau? Well our plan is to keep supporting Nouveau for the foreseeable future because it is an in-tree driver, which is a lot easier to ensure keeps working with each new upstream kernel release.

At the same time the new firmware updates allows Nouveau to eventually offer performance levels competitive with the official out-of-tree driver, kind of how the open source AMD driver with MESA offers comparable performance to AMD binary GPU driver userspace. So Nouvea maintainer Ben Skeggs spent the last year working hard on refactoring Nouveau to work with the new firmware and we now have a new release of Nouveau out showing the fruits of that labor, enabling support for NVIDIAs latest chipset. Over time we will have it cover more chipset and expand Vulkan and OpenGL (using Zink) support to be a full fledged accelerated graphics driver.
So some news here, Ben after having worked tirelessly on keeping Nouveau afloat for so many years decided he needed a change of pace and thus decided to leave software development behind for the time being. A big thank you to Ben from all us at Red Hat and Fedora ! The good news is that Danilo Krummrich will take over as the development lead, with Lyude Paul taking on working on the Display side specifically of the driver. We also expect to have other members of the team chipping in too. They will pick up Bens work and continue working with NVIDIA and the community on a bright future for Nouveau.

So as I mentioned though the new open source driver from NVIDIA is still being matured for the display usercase and until it works fully as a display driver neither will Nouveau be able to be a full alternative since they share the same firmware. So people will need to rely on the binary NVIDIA Driver for some time still. One thing we are looking at there and discussing is if there are ways for us to improve the experience of using that binary driver with Secure Boot enabled. Atm that requires quite a bit of manual fiddling with tools like mokutils, but we have some ideas on how to streamline that a bit, but it is a hard nut to solve due to a combination of policy issues, legal issues, security issues and hardware/UEFI bugs so I am making no promises at this point, just a promise that it is something we are looking at.

Accessibility
Accessibility is an important feature for us in Fedora Workstation and thus we hired Lukáš Tyrychtr to focus on the issue. Lukáš has been working through across the stack fixing issues blocking proper accessibility support in Fedora Workstation and also participated in various accessibility related events. There is still a lot to do there so I was very happy to hear recently that the GNOME Foundation got a million Euro sponsorship from the Sovereign Tech Fund to improve various things across the stack, especially improving accessibility. So the combination of Lukáš continued efforts and that new investment should make for a much improved accessibility experience in GNOME and in Fedora Workstation going forward.

GNOME Software
Another area that we keep investing in is improving GNOME Software, with Milan Crha working continuously on bugfixing and performance improvements. GNOME Software is actually a fairly complex piece of software as it has to be able to handle the installation and updating of RPMS, OSTree system images, Flatpaks, fonts and firmware for us in addition to the formats it handles for other distributions. For some time it felt was GNOME Software was struggling with the load of all those different formats and usercases and was becoming both slow and with a lot of error messages. Milan has been spending a lot of time dealing with those issues one by one and also recently landed some major performance improvements making the GNOME Software experience a lot better. One major change that Milan is working on that I think we will be able to land in Fedora Workstation 40/41 is porting GNOME Software to use DNF5. The main improvement end users will probably notice is that it unifies the caches used for GNOME Software and using dnf on the command line, saving you storage space and also ensuring the two are fully in sync on what RPMS is installed/updated at any given time.

Fedora and Flatpaks

Flatpaks is another key element of our strategy for moving the Linux desktop forward and as part of that we have now enabled all of Flathub to be available if you choose to enable 3rd party repositories when you install Fedora Workstation. This means that the huge universe of applications available on Flathub will be easy to install through GNOME Software alongside the content available in Fedora’s own repositories. That said we have also spent time improving the ease of making Fedora Flatpaks. Owen Taylor jumped in and removed the dependency on a technology called ‘modularity‘ which was initially introduced to Fedora to bring new features around having different types of content and ease keeping containers up to date. Unfortunately it did not work out as intended and instead it became something that everyone just felt made things a lot more complicated, including building Flatpaks from Fedora content. With Owens updates building Flatpaks in Fedora has become a lot simpler and should help energize the effort building Flatpaks in Fedora.

Toolbx
As we continue marching towards a vision for Fedora Workstation to be a highly robust operating we keep evolving Toolbx. Our tool for making running your development environment(s) inside a container and thus allows you to both keep your host OS pristine and up to date, while at the same time using specific toolchains and tools inside the development container. This is a hard requirement for immutable operating systems such as Fedora Silverblue or Universal blue, but it is also useful on operating systems like Fedora Workstation as a way to do development for other platforms, like for instance Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

A major focus for Toolbx since the inception is to get it a stage where it is robust and reliable. So for instance while we prototyped it as a shell script, today it is written in Go to be more maintainable and also to confirm with the rest of the container ecosystem. A recent major step forward for getting that stability there is that starting with Fedora 39, the toolbox image is now a release blocking deliverable. This means it is now built as part of the nightly compose and the whole Toolbx stack (ie. the fedora-toolbox image and the toolbox RPM) is part of the release-blocking test criteria. This shows the level of importance we put on Toolbx as the future of Linux software development and its criticality to Fedora Workstation. Earlier, we built the fedora-toobox image as a somewhat separate and standalone thing, and people interested in Toolbx would try to test and keep the whole thing working, as much as possible, on their own. This was becoming unmanageable because Toolbx integrates with many parts of the distribution from Mutter (ie, the Wayland and X sockets) to Kerberos to RPM (ie., %_netsharedpath in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.toolbox) to glibc locale definitions and translations. The list of things that could change elsewhere in Fedora, and end up breaking Toolbx, was growing too large for a small group of Toolbx contributors to keep track of.

We the next release we now also have built-in support for Arch Linux and Ubuntu through the –distro flag in toolbox.git main, thanks again to the community contributors who worked with us on this allowing us to widen the amount of distros supported while keeping with our policy of reliability and dependability. And along the same theme of ensuring Toolbx is a tool developers can rely on we have added lots and lots of new tests. We now have more than 280 tests that run on CentOS Stream 9, all supported Fedoras and Rawhide, and Ubuntu 22.04.

Another feature that Toolbx maintainer Debarshi Ray put a lot of effort into is setting up full RHEL containers in Toolbx on top of Fedora. Today, thanks to Debarshi work you do subscription-manager register --username user@domain.name on the Fedora or RHEL host, and the container is automatically entitled to RHEL content. We are still looking at how we can provide a graphical interface for that process or at least how to polish up the CLI for doing subscription-manager register. If you are interested in this feature, Debarshi provides a full breakdown here.

Other nice to haves added is support for enterprise FreeIPA set-ups, where the user logs into their machine through Kerberos and support for automatically generated shell completions for Bash, fish and Z shell.

Flatpak and Foreman & Katello
For those out there using Foreman to manage your fleet of Linux installs we have some good news. We are in the process of implementing support for Flatpaks in these tools so that you can manage and deploy applications in the Flatpak format using them. This is still a work in progress, but relevant Pulp and Katello commits are Pulp commit Support for Flatpak index endpoints and Katello commits Reporting results of docker v2 repo discovery” and Support Link header in docker v2 repo discovery“.

LVFS
Another effort that Fedora Workstation has brought to the world of Linux and that is very popular arethe LVFS and fwdup formware update repository and tools. Thanks to that effort we are soon going to be passing one hundred million firmware updates on Linux devices soon! These firmware updates has helped resolve countless bugs and much improved security for Linux users.

But we are not slowing down. Richard Hughes worked with industry partners this year to define a Bill of Materials defintion to firmware updates allowing usings to be better informed on what is included in their firmware updates.

We now support over 1400 different devices on the LVFS (covering 78 different protocols!), with over 8000 public firmware versions (image below) from over 150 OEMs and ODMs. We’ve now done over 100,000 static analysis tests on over 2,000,000 EFI binaries in the firmware capsules!

Some examples of recently added hardware:
* AMD dGPUs, Navi3x and above, AVer FONE540, Belkin Thunderbolt 4 Core Hub dock, CE-LINK TB4 Docks,CH347 SPI programmer, EPOS ADAPT 1×5, Fibocom FM101, Foxconn T99W373, SDX12, SDX55 and SDX6X devices, Genesys GL32XX SD readers, GL352350, GL3590, GL3525S and GL3525 USB hubs, Goodix Touch controllers, HP Rata/Remi BLE Mice, Intel USB-4 retimers, Jabra Evolve 65e/t and SE, Evolve2, Speak2 and Link devices, Logitech Huddle, Rally System and Tap devices, Luxshare Quad USB4 Dock, MediaTek DP AUX Scalers, Microsoft USB-C Travel Hub, More Logitech Unifying receivers, More PixartRF HPAC devices, More Synaptics Prometheus fingerprint readers, Nordic HID devices, nRF52 Desktop Keyboard, PixArt BLE HPAC OTA, Quectel EM160 and RM520, Some Western Digital eMMC devices, Star Labs StarBook Mk VIr2, Synaptics Triton devices, System76 Launch 3, Launch Heavy 3 and Thelio IO 2, TUXEDO InfinityBook Pro 13 v3, VIA VL122, VL817S, VL822T, VL830 and VL832, Wacom Cintiq Pro 27, DTH134 and DTC121, One 13 and One 12 Tablets

InputLeap on Wayland
One really interesting feature that landed for Fedora Workstation 39 was the support for InputLeap. It’s probably not on most peoples radar, but it’s an important feature for system administrators, developers and generally anyone with more than a single computer on their desk.

Historically, InputLeap is a fork of Barrier which itself was a fork of Synergy, it allows to share the same input devices (mouse, keyboard) across different computers (Linux, Windows, MacOS) and to move the pointer between the screens of these computers seamlessly as if they were one.

InputLeap has a client/server architecture with the server running on the main host (the one with the keyboard and mouse connected) and multiple clients, the other machines sitting next to the server machine. That implies two things, the InputLeap daemon on the server must be able to “capture” all the input events to forward them to the remote clients when the pointer reaches the edge of the screen, and the InputLeap client must be able to “replay” those input events on the client host to make it as if the keyboard and mouse were connected directly to the (other) computer. Historically, that relied on X11 mechanisms and neither InputLeap (nor Barrier or even Synergy as a matter of fact) would work on Wayland.

This is one of the use cases that Peter Hutterer had in mind when he started libEI, a low-level library aimed at providing a separate communication channel for input emulation in Wayland compositors and clients (even though libEI is not strictly tied to Wayland). But libEI alone is far from being sufficient to implement InputLeap features, with Wayland we had the opportunity to make things more secure than X11 and take benefit from the XDG portal mechanisms.

On the client side, for replaying input events, it’s similar to remote desktop but we needed to update the existing RemoteDesktop portal to pass the libEI socket. On the server side, it required a brand new portal for input capture . These also required their counterparts in the GNOME portal, for both RemoteDesktop and InputCapture [8], and of course, all that needs to be supported by the Wayland compositor, in the case of GNOME that’s mutter. That alone was a lot of work.

Yet, even with all that in place, that’s just the basic requirements to support a Synergy/Barrier/InputLeap-like feature, the tools in question need to have support for the portal and libEI implemented to benefit from the mechanisms we’ve put in place and for the all feature to work and be usable. So libportal was also updated to support the new portal features and a new “Wayland” backend alongside the X11, Windows and Mac OS backends was contributed to InputLeap.

The merge request in InputLeap was accepted very early, even before the libEI API was completely stabilized and before the rest of the stack was merged, which I believe was a courageous choice from Povilas (who maintains InputLeap) which helped reduce the time to have the feature actually working, considering the number of components and inter-dependencies involved. Of course, there are still features missing in the Wayland backend, like copy/pasting between hosts, but a clipboard interface was fairly recently added to the remote desktop portal and therefore could be used by InputLeap to implement that feature.

Fun fact, Xwayland also grew support for libEI also using the remote desktop portal and wires that to the XTEST extension on X11 that InputLeap’s X11 backend uses, so it might even be possible to use the X11 backend of InputLeap in the client side through Xwayland, but of course it’s better to use the Wayland backend on both the client and server sides.

InputLeap is a great example of collaboration between multiple parties upstream including key contributions from us at Red Hat to implement and contribute a feature that has been requested for years upstream..

Thank you to Olivier Fourdan, Debarshi Ray, Richard Hughes, Sebastian Wick and Jonas Ådahl for their contributions to this blog post.

Update from the world of Fedora Workstation

Posted on by

Let me start by saying that I now also have a Mastodon account, so please follow me on @Cfkschaller@fosstodon.org for news and updates around Fedora Workstation, PipeWire, Wayland, LVFS and Linux in general.

Fedora vs Fedora Workstation
Before I start with the general development update I want to mention something I mentioned quite a few times before and that is the confusion I often find people have about what is Fedora and what is Fedora Workstation.

Fedora Workstation

Fedora is our overall open source project and community working on packaging components and software for the various outputs that the Fedora community delivers. Think of the Fedora community a bit like a big group of people providing well tested and maintained building blocks to be used to build operating systems and applications. As part of that bigger community you have a lot of working groups and special interest groups working to build something with those building blocks and Fedora Workstation is the most popular thing being built from those building blocks. That means that Fedora Workstation isn’t ‘Fedora’ it is something created by the Fedora community alongside a lot of other projects like Fedora Server, Silverblue and Fedora spins like Fedora KDE and Fedora Kinoite. But all them should be considered separate efforts built using a shared set of building blocks.
Putting together an operating system like Fedora Workstation is more than just assembling a list of software components to include though, it is also about setting policies, default configurations, testing and QE and marketing. This means that while Fedora Workstation contains many of the same components of other things like the Fedora KDE Plasma Desktop spin, the XFCE Desktop spin, the Cinnamon spin and so on, they are not the same thing. And that is not just because the feature set of GNOME is different from the feature set of XFCE, it is because each variant is able to set their own policies, their own configurations and do their own testing and QE. Different variants adopted different technologies at different times, for instance Fedora Workstation was an early adopter of new technologies like Wayland and PipeWire. So the reason I keep stressing this point is that I to this day often see comments or feedback about ‘Fedora’, feedback which as someone spending a lot of effort on Fedora Workstation, sometimes makes no sense to me, only to reach out and discover that they where not using Fedora Workstation, but one of the spins. So I do ask people, especially those who are members of the technology press to be more precise in their reviews, about if they are talking about Fedora Workstation or another project that is housed under the Fedora umbrella and not just shorten it all to ‘Fedora’.

Fedora Workstation

Fedora Workstation


Anyway, onwards to updating you on some of the work we are doing in and around Fedora Workstation currently.

High Dynamic Range – HDR

HDR

HDR

A major goal for us at Red Hat is to get proper HDR support into Fedora and RHEL. Sebastian Wick is leading that effort for us and working with partners and contributors across the community and the industry. For those who read my past updates you know I have been talking about this for a while, but it has been slow moving both because it is a very complex issue that needs changes from the kernel graphics drivers up through the desktop shell and into the application GUI toolkits. As Sebastian put it when I spoke with him, HDR forces us (the Linux ecosystem) to take colors seriously for the first time and thus it reveals a lot of shortcomings up through our stack, many which are not even directly HDR related.
Support for High Dynamic Range (HDR) requires compositors to produce framebuffers in specific HDR encodings with framebuffers from different clients. Most clients nowadays are unaware of HDR, Wide Color Gamuts (WCG) and instead produce pixels with RGB encodings which look okay on most displays which approximate sRGB characteristics. Converting different encodings to the common HDR encoding requires clients to communicate their encoding, the compositor to adjust and convert between the different color spaces, and the driver to enable an HDR mode in the display. Converting between the encodings should ideally be done by the scanout engine of the GPU to keep the latency and power benefits of direct scanout. Similarly, applications and toolkits have to understand different encodings and how to convert between them to make use of HDR and WCG features.

Essentially, HDR forces us to handle color correctly and makes color management an integral part of the system.
So in no particular order here are some of the issues we have found and are looking at:

  • Display brightness controls are today limited to a single, internal monitor and setting the brightness level to zero might or might not turn off the screen. The luminance setting might scale linearly or approximate the human brightness perception depending on hardware. Hans de Goede on our team is working on fixing these issues to get as coherent behaviour from different hardware as possible.
  • GStreamers glcolorconvert element doesn’t actually convert colors, which breaks playback of videos on some HDR and WCG encoded videos.
  • There are also some challenges with limitations in the current KMS API. User space cannot select the bit depth of the colors sent to the display, nor whether a YUV format with subsampling is used. Both are driver internal magic which can reduce the quality of the image but might be required to light up displays with the limited bandwidth available. The handling of limited and full range colors is driver defined and an override for badly behaving sinks is only available on Intel and VC4. And offloading the color transformations to the scanout hardware is impossible with the KMS API. Available features, their order and configurability varies a lot between hardware. To avoid any discrepancy between the offloaded and the software case the entire color pipeline has to be predictable by user space. We’re currently working together with hardware vendors to look at ways forward here.
  • To handle the communication of the color metadata between clients and compositors Sebastian is working with the wider community to define two work-in-progress wayland protocols. The color representation protocol describes how to go from a tristimulus value to the encoding (this includes YUV to RGB conversions, full vs limited color range, chroma siting) and the color-management protocol for describes the tristimulus values (primaries, whitepoint, OETF, ICC profile, dynamic range).
  • There is also now a repository on FreeDesktop.org’s GitLab instance to document and discuss all things related to colors on Linux. This required a lot of research, thinking and discussing about how everything is supposed to fit together.
  • Compositors have to look up information from EDID and DisplayID for HDR. The data is notoriously unreliable currently so Simon Ser, Pekka Paalanen and Sebastian started a new project called libdisplay-info for parsing and quirking EDID+DisplayID.
  • Mutter is now in charge of ICC profile handling and we’re planning to deprecate the old colord daemon. Work on supporting high bit depth framebuffers and enabling HDR mode is ongoing and should give us an experimental setup for figuring out how to combine different SDR and HDR content.

Headless display and automated test of the GNOME Shell

Jonas Ådahl has been working on getting headless display working correctly under Wayland for a bit and as part of that also been working on using the headless display support to enable automated testing of gnome-shell. The core work to get GNOME Shell to be able to run headless on top of Wayland finished some time ago, but there are still some related tasks that need further work.

  • The most critical is remote login. With some hand holding it works and supports TPM based authentication for single user sessions, but currently lacks a nice way to start it. This item is on the very top of Jonas todo list so hopefully we can cross it off soon.
  • Remote multi user login: This feature is currently in active development and will make it possible to get a gdm login screen via gnome-remote-desktop where one can type ones username and password getting a headless session. The remote multi user login is a collaboration between Jonas Ådahl, Pascal Nowack, the author of the RDP backend in gnome-remote-desktop and Joan Torres from SUSE.
  • Testing: Jonas has also been putting in a lot of work recently to improve automated testing of GNOME Shell on the back of the headless display support. You can read more about that in his recent blog post on the subject.

HID-BPF

Benjamin Tissoires has been working on a set of kernel patches for some time now that implements something called HID-BPF. HID referring to Human Interface Devices (like mice, keyboard, joysticks and so on) and BPF is a kernel and user-space observability scheme for the Linux kernel. If you want to learn more about BPF in general I recommend this Linux Journal article on the subject. This blog post will talk specifically about HID-BPF and not BPF in general. We are expecting this patcheset to either land in 6.2 or it might get delayed to 6.3.
The kernel documentation explains in length and through examples how to use HID-BPF and when. The summary would be that in the HID world, we often have to tweak a single byte on a device to make it work, simply because HW makers only test their device under Windows, and they can provide a “driver” that has the fix in software. So most of the time it comes to changing a few bytes in the report descriptor of the HID device, or on the fly when we receive an event. For years, we have been doing this sort of fixes in the kernel through the normal kernel driver model. But it is a relatively slow way of doing it and we should be able to be more efficient.

The kernel driver model process involves multiple steps and requires the reporter of the issue to test the fix at every step. The reporter has an issue and contacts a kernel developer to fix that device (sometimes, the reporter and the kernel developers are the same person). To be able to submit the fix, it has to be tested, and so compiled in the kernel upstream tree, which means that we require regular users to compile their kernel. This is not an easy feat, but that’s how we do it. Then, the patch is sent to the list and reviewed. This often leads to v2, v3 of the patch requiring the user to recompile a new kernel. Once it’s accepted, we still need to wait for the patch to land in Linus’ tree, and then for the kernel to be taken by distributions. And this is only now that the reporter can drop the custom kernel build. Of course, during that time, the reporter has a choice to make: should I update my distro kernel to get security updates and drop my fix, or should I recompile the kernel to keep everybody up to date, or should I just stick with my kernel version because my fix is way more important?
So how can HID-BPF make this easier?

So instead of the extensive process above. A fix can be written as a BPF program which can be run on any kernel. So instead of asking the reporter to recompile the upstream kernel, a kernel developer can compile the BPF program, and provide both the sources and the binary to the tester. The tester now just has to drop that binary in a given directory to have a userspace component automatically binding this program to the device. When the review process happens, we can easily ask testers to update their BPF program, and they don’t even need to reboot (just unplug/replug the target device). For the developers, we continue doing the review, and we merge the program directly in the source tree. Not even a single #define needs to differ. Then an automated process (yet to be fully determined, but Benjamin has an RFC out there) builds that program into the kernel tree, and we can safely ship that tested program. When the program hits the distribution kernel, the user doesn’t even notice it: given that the kernel already ships that BPF program, the userspace will just not attach itself to the device, meaning that the test user will even benefit from the latest fixes if there were any without any manual intervention. Of course, if the user wants to update the kernel because of a security problem or another bug, the user will get both: the security fix and the HID fix still there.

That single part is probably the most appealing thing about HID-BPF. And of course, this translate very well in the enterprise Linux world: when a customer has an issue on a HID device that can be fixed by HID-BPF, we can provide to that customer the pre-compiled binary to introduce in the filesystem without having to rely on a kernel update.
But there is more: we can now start implementing a HID firewall (so that only fwupd can change the firmware of a HID device), we can also tell people not to invent ad-hoc kernel APIs, but rely on eBPF to expose that functionality (so that if the userspace program is not there, we don’t even expose that capability). And we can be even more creative, like deciding to change how the kernel presents a device to the userspace.

Benjamin speaking a Kernel Recipies


For more details I recommend checking out the talk Benjamin did at the kernel recipes conference.

MIPI Camera
Kate Hsuan and Hans de Goede have been working together trying to get the Linux support for MIPI cameras into shape. MIPI cameras are the next generation of PC cameras and you are going to see more and more laptops shipping with these so it is critical for us to get them working and working well and this work is also done in the context of our close collaboration with Lenovo around the Fedora laptops they offer.
Without working support, Fedora Workstation users who buy a laptop equipped with a MIPI camera will only get a black image. The long term solution for MIPI cameras is a library called libcamera which is a project lead by Laurent Pinchart and Kieran Bingham from IdeasOnBoard and sponsored by Google. For desktop Linux users you probably are not going to have applications interact directly with libcamera though, instead our expectation is that your applications use libcamera through PipeWire and the Flatpak portal. Thanks to the work of the community we now have support for the Intel IPU3 MIPI stack in the kernel and through libcamera, but the Intel IPU6 MIPI stack is the one we expect to see head into laptops in a major way and thus our current effort is focused on bringing support for that in a useful way to Fedora users. Intel has so far provided a combination of binary and limited open source code to support these cameras under Linux, by using GStreamer to provide an emulated V4l2 device. This is not a great long term solution, but it does provide us with at least an intermediate solution until we can get IPU6 working with libcamera. Based on his successful work on IPU3, Hans de Goede has been working on getting the necessary part of the Intel open source driver for IPU6 upstreamed since that is the basic interface to control the IPU6 and image sensor. Kate has been working on packaging all the remaining Intel non-free binary and software releases into RPM packages. The packages will provide the v4l2loopback solution which should work with any software supporting V4l2. These packages were planned to go live soon in RPM fusion nonfree repository.

LVFS – Linux Vendor Firmware Service
Richard Hughes is still making great strides forward with the now ubiques LVFS service. A few months ago we pushed the UEFI dbx update to the LVFS, which has now been downloaded over 4 million times. This pushed the total downloads to a new high of 5 million updates just in the 4 weeks of September, although it’s returned to a more normal growth pattern now.

The LVFS also now supports 1,163 different devices, and is being used by 137 different vendors. Since we started all those years ago we’ve provided at least 74 million updates to end-users although it’s probably even more given that lots of Red Hat customers mirror the entire LVFS for internal use. Not to mention that thanks to Richards collaboration with Google LVFS is now an integral part of the ‘Works with ChromeOS’ program.

On the LVFS we also now show the end-user provided HSI reports for a lot of popular hardware. This is really useful to check how secure the device will likely be before buying new hardware, regardless if the vendor is uploading to the LVFS. We’ve also asked ODMs and OEMs who do actually use the LVFS to use signed reports so we can continue to scale up LVFS. Once that is in place we can continue to scale up, aiming for 10,000 supported devices, and to 100 million downloads.

LVFS analytics

Latest LVFS statistics

PipeWire & OBS Studio

In addition to doing a bunch of bug fixes and smaller improvements around audio in PipeWire, Wim Taymans has spent time recently working on getting the video side of PipeWire in shape. We decided to use OBS Studio as our ‘proof of concept’ application because there was already a decent set of patches from Georges Stavracas and Columbarius that Wim could build upon. Getting the Linux developer community to adopt PipeWire for video will be harder than it was for audio since we can not do a drop in replacement, instead it will require active porting by application developers. Unlike for audio where PipeWire provides a binary compatible implementation of the ALSA, PulesAudio and JACK apis we can not provide a re-implementation of the V4L API that can run transparently and reliably in place of the actual V4L2. That said, Wim has created a tool called pw-v4l2 which tries to redirect the v4l2 calls into PipeWire, so you can use that for some testing, for example by running ‘pw-v4l2 cheese’ on the command line and you will see Cheese appear in the PipeWire patchbay applications Helvum and qpwgraph. As stated though it is not reliable enough to be something we can for instance have GNOME Shell do as a default for all camera handling applications. Instead we will rely on application developers out there to look at the work we did in OBS Studio as a best practice example and then implement camera input through PipeWire using that. This brings with it a lot of advantages though, like transparent support for libcamera alongside v4l2 and easy sharing of the video streams between multiple applications.
One thing to note about this is that at the moment we have two ‘equal’ video backends in PipeWire, V4L2 and libcamera, which means you get offered the same device twice, once from v4l2 and once from libcamera. Obviously this is a little confusing and annoying. Since libcamera is still in heavy development the v4l2 backend is more reliable for now, so Fedora Workstation we will be shipping with the v4l2 backend ‘out of the box’, but allow you to easily install the libcamera backend. As libcamera matures we will switch over to the libcamera backend (and allow you to install the v4l backend if you still need/want it for some reason.)

Helvum running OBS Studio with native PipeWire support and Cheese using the pw-v4l2 re-directer.

Of course the most critical thing to get ported to use PipeWire for camera handling is the web browsers. Luckily thanks to the work of Pengutronix there is a patchset ready to be merged into WebRTC, which is the implementation used by both Chromium/Chrome and Firefox. While I can make no promises we are currently looking to see if it is viable for us to start shipping that patch in the Fedora Firefox package soon.

And finally thanks to the work by Jan Grulich in collaboration with Google engineers PipeWire is now included in the Chromium test build which has allowed Google to enable PipeWire for screen sharing enabled by default. Having PipeWire in the test builds is also going to be critical for getting the camera handling patch merged and enabled.

Flathub, Flatpak and Fedora

As I have spoken about before, we have a clear goal of moving as close as we can to a Flatpak only model for Fedora Workstation. The are a lot of reasons for this like making applications more robust (i.e. the OS doesn’t keep moving fast underneath the application), making updates more reliable (because an application updating its dependencies doesn’t risk conflicting with the needs of other application), making applications more portable in the sense that they will not need to be rebuilt for each variety of operating system, to provide better security since applications can be sandboxed in a container with clear access limitations and to allow us to move to an OS model like we have in Silverblue with an immutable core.
So over the last years we spent a lot of effort alongside other members of the Linux community preparing the ground to allow us to go in this direction, with improvements to GTK+ and Qt for instance to allow them to work better in sandboxes like the one provided by Flatpak.
There has also been strong support and growth around Flathub which now provides a wide range of applications in Flatpak format and being used for most major Linux distributions out there. As part of that we have been working to figure out policies and user interface to allow us to enable Flathub fully in Fedora (currently there is a small allowlisted selection available when you enable 3rd party software). This change didn’t make it into Fedora Workstation 37, but we do hope to have it ready for Fedora Workstation 38. As part of that effort we also hope to take another look at the process for building Flatpaks inside Fedora to reduce the barrier for Fedora developers to do so.

So how do we see things evolving in terms of distribution packaging? Well that is a good question. First of all a huge part of what goes into a distribution is not Flatpak material considering that Flatpaks are squarely aimed at shipping GUI desktop applications. There are a huge list of libraries and tools that are either used to build the distribution itself, like Wayland, GNOME Shell, libinput, PipeWire etc. or tools used by developers on top of the operating system like Python, Perl, Rust tools etc. So these will be needed to be RPM packaged for the distribution regardless. And there will be cases where you still want certain applications to be RPM packaged going forward. For instance many of you hopefully are aware of Container Toolbx, our effort to make pet containers a great tool for developers. What you install into your toolbox, including some GUI applications like many IDEs will still need to be packages as RPMS and installed into each toolbox as they have no support for interacting with a toolbox from the host. Over time we hope that more IDEs will follow in GNOME Builders footsteps and become container aware and thus can be run from the host system as a Flatpak, but apart from Owen Taylors VS Code integration plugin most of them are not yet and thus needs to be installed inside your Toolbx.

As for building Flatpaks in Fedora as opposed to on Flathub, we are working on improving the developer experience around that. There are many good reasons why one might want to maintain a Fedora Flatpak, things like liking the Fedora content and security policies or just being more familiar with using the tested and vetted Fedora packages. Of course there are good reasons why developers might prefer maintaining applications on Flathub too, we are fine with either, but we want to make sure that whatever path you choose we have a great developer and package maintainer experience for you.

Multi-Stream Transport

Multi-monitor setups have become more and more common and popular so one effort we spent time on for the last few years is Lyude Paul working to clean up the MST support in the kernel. MST is a specification for DisplayPort that allows multiple monitors to be driven from a single DisplayPort port by multiplexing several video streams into a single stream and sending it to a branch device, which demultiplexes the signal into the original streams. DisplayPort MST will usually take the form of a single USB-C or DisplayPort connection. More recently, we’ve also seen higher resolution displays – and complicated technologies like DSC (Display Stream Compression) which need proper driver support in order to function.

Making setups like docks work is no easy task. In the Linux kernel, we have a set of shared code that any video driver can use in order to much more easily implement support for features like DisplayPort MST. We’ve put quite a lot of work into making this code both viable for any driver to use, but also to build new functionality on top of for features such as DSC. Our hope is that with this we can both encourage the growth of support for functionality like MST, and support of further features like DSC from vendors through this work. Since this code is shared, this can also come with the benefit that any new functionality implemented through this path is far easier to add to other drivers.
Lyude has mostly finished this work now and recently have been focusing on fixing some regressions that accidentally came upstream in amdgpu. The main stuff she was working on beforehand was a lot of code cleanup, particularly removing a bunch of the legacy MST code. For context: with kernel modesetting we have legacy modesetting, and atomic modesetting. Atomic modesetting is what’s used for modern drivers, and it’s a great deal simpler to work with than legacy modesetting. Most of the MST helpers were written before atomic was a thing, and as a result there was a pretty big mess of code that both didn’t really need to be there – and actively made it a lot more difficult to implement new functionality and figure out whether bug fixes that were being submitted to Lyude were even correct or not. Now that we’ve cleaned this up though, the MST helpers make heavy use of atomic and this has definitely simplified the code quite a bit.

How to get your application to show up in GNOME Software

Posted on by

Adding Applications to the GNOME Software Center

Written by Richard Hughes and Christian F.K. Schaller

This blog post is based on a white paper style writeup Richard and I did a few years ago, since I noticed this week there wasn’t any other comprehensive writeup online on the topic of how to add the required metadata to get an application to appear in GNOME Software (or any other major open source appstore) online I decided to turn the writeup into a blog post, hopefully useful to the wider community. I tried to clean it up a bit as I converted it from the old white paper, so hopefully all information in here is valid as of this posting.

Abstract

Traditionally we have had little information about Linux applications before they have been installed. With the creation of a software center we require access to rich set of metadata about an application before it is deployed so it it can be displayed to the user and easily installed. This document is meant to be a guide for developers who wish to get their software appearing in the Software stores in Fedora Workstation and other distributions. Without the metadata described in this document your application is likely to go undiscovered by many or most linux users, but by reading this document you should be able to relatively quickly prepare you application.

Introduction

GNOME Software

Installing applications on Linux has traditionally involved copying binary and data files into a directory and just writing a single desktop file into a per-user or per-system directory so that it shows up in the desktop environment. In this document we refer to applications as graphical programs, rather than other system add-on components like drivers and codecs. This document will explain why the extra metadata is required and what is required for an application to be visible in the software center. We will try to document how to do this regardless of if you choose to package your application as a rpm package or as a flatpak bundle. The current rules is a combination of various standards that have evolved over the years and will will try to summarize and explain them here, going from bottom to top.

System Architecture

Linux File Hierarchy

Traditionally applications on Linux are expected to install binary files to /usr/bin, the install architecture independent data files to /usr/share/ and configuration files to /etc. If you want to package your application as a flatpak the prefix used will be /app so it is critical for applications to respect the prefix setting. Small temporary files can be stored in /tmp and much larger files in /var/tmp. Per-user configuration is either stored in the users home directory (in ~/.config) or stored in a binary settings store such as dconf. As an application developer never hardcode these paths, but set them following the XDG standard so that they relocate correctly inside a Flatpak.

Desktop files

Desktop files have been around for a long while now and are used by almost all Linux desktops to provide the basic description of a desktop application that your desktop environment will display. Like a human readable name and an icon.

So the creation of a desktop file on Linux allows a program to be visible to the graphical environment, e.g. KDE or GNOME Shell. If applications do not have a desktop file they must be manually launched using a terminal emulator. Desktop files must adhere to the Desktop File Specification and provide metadata in an ini-style format such as:

  • Binary type, typically ‘Application’
  • Program name (optionally localized)
  • Icon to use in the desktop shell
  • Program binary name to use for launching
  • Any mime types that can be opened by the applications (optional)
  • The standard categories the application should be included in (optional)
  • Keywords (optional, and optionally localized)
  • Short one-line summary (optional, and optionally localized)

The desktop file should be installed into /usr/share/applications for applications that are installed system wide. An example desktop file provided below:


[Desktop Entry]
Type=Application
Name=OpenSCAD
Icon=openscad
Exec=openscad %f
MimeType=application/x-openscad;
Categories=Graphics;3DGraphics;Engineering;
Keywords=3d;solid;geometry;csg;model;stl;

The desktop files are used when creating the software center metadata, and so you should verify that you ship a .desktop file for each built application, and that these keys exist: Name, Comment, Icon, Categories, Keywords and Exec and that desktop-file-validate correctly validates the file. There should also be only one desktop file for each application.

The application icon should be in the PNG format with a transparent background and installed in
/usr/share/icons,/usr/share/icons/hicolor//apps/, or /usr/share/${app_name}/icons/*. The icon should be at least 128×128 in size (as this is the minimum size required by Flathub).

The file name of the desktop file is also very important, as this is the assigned ‘application ID’. New applications typically use a reverse-DNS style, e.g. org.gnome.Nautilus would be the app-id. And the .desktop entry file should thus be name org.gnome.Nautilus.desktop, but older programs may just use a short name, e.g. gimp.desktop. It is important to note that the file extension is also included as part of the desktop ID.

You can verify your desktop file using the command ‘desktop-file-validate’. You just run it like this:


desktop-file-validate myapp.desktop

This tools is available through the desktop-file-utils package, which you can install on Fedora Workstation using this command


dnf install desktop-file-utils

You also need what is called a metainfo file (previously known as AppData file= file with the suffix .metainfo.xml (some applications still use the older .appdata.xml name) file should be installed into /usr/share/metainfo with a name that matches the name of the .desktop file, e.g. gimp.desktop & gimp.metainfo.xml or org.gnome.Nautilus.desktop & org.gnome.Nautilus.metainfo.xml.

In the metainfo file you should include several 16:9 aspect screenshots along with a compelling translated description made up of multiple paragraphs.

In order to make it easier for you to do screenshots in 16:9 format we created a small GNOME Shell extension called ‘Screenshot Window Sizer’. You can install it from the GNOME Extensions site.

Once it is installed you can resize the window of your application to 16:9 format by focusing it and pressing ‘ctrl+alt+s’ (you can press the key combo multiple times to get the correct size). It should resize your application window to a perfect 16:9 aspect ratio and let you screenshot it.

Make sure you follow the style guide, which can be tested using the appstreamcli command line tool. appstreamcli is part of the ‘appstream’ package in Fedora Workstation.:


appstreamcli validate foo.metainfo.xml

If you don’t already have the appstreamcli installed it can be installed using this command on Fedora Workstation:

dnf install appstream

What is allowed in an metainfo file is defined in the AppStream specification but common items typical applications add is:

  • License of the upstream project in SPDX identifier format [6], or ‘Proprietary’
  • A translated name and short description to show in the software center search results
  • A translated long description, consisting of multiple paragraphs, itemized and ordered lists.
  • A number of screenshots, with localized captions, typically in 16:9 aspect ratio
  • An optional list of releases with the update details and release information.
  • An optional list of kudos which tells the software center about the integration level of the
    application
  • A set of URLs that allow the software center to provide links to help or bug information
  • Content ratings and hardware compatibility
  • An optional gettext or QT translation domain which allows the AppStream generator to collect statistics on shipped application translations.

A typical (albeit somewhat truncated) metainfo file is shown below:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<component type="desktop-application">
<id>org.gnome.Terminal</id>
<metadata_license>GPL-3.0+ or GFDL-1.3-only</metadata_license>
<project_license>GPL-3.0+</project_license>
<name>Terminal</name>
<name xml:lang="ar">الطرفية</name>
<name xml:lang="an">Terminal</name>
<summary>Use the command line</summary>
<summary xml:lang="ar">استعمل سطر الأوامر</summary>
<summary xml:lang="an">Emplega la linia de comandos</summary>
<description>
<p>GNOME Terminal is a terminal emulator application for accessing a UNIX shell environment which can be used to run programs available on your system.</p>
<p xml:lang="ar">يدعم تشكيلات مختلفة، و الألسنة و العديد من اختصارات لوحة المفاتيح.</p>
<p xml:lang="an">Suporta quantos perfils, quantas pestanyas y implementa quantos alcorces de teclau.</p>
</description>
<recommends>
<control>console</control>
<control>keyboard</control>
<control>pointing</control>
</recommends>
<screenshots>
<screenshot type="default">https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-terminal/stable/figures/gnome-terminal.png</screenshot>
</screenshots>
<kudos>
<kudo>HiDpiIcon</kudo>
<kudo>HighContrast</kudo>
<kudo>ModernToolkit</kudo>
<kudo>SearchProvider</kudo>
<kudo>UserDocs</kudo>
</kudos>
<content_rating type="oars-1.1"/>
<url type="homepage">https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Terminal</url>
<project_group>GNOME</project_group>
<update_contact>https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Terminal/ReportingBugs</update_contact>
</component>

Some Appstrean background

The Appstream specification is an mature and evolving standard that allows upstream applications to provide metadata such as localized descriptions, screenshots, extra keywords and content ratings for parental control. This intoduction just touches on the surface what it provides so I recommend reading the specification through once you understood the basics. The core concept is that the upstream project ships one extra metainfo XML file which is used to build a global application catalog called a metainfo file. Thousands of open source projects now include metainfo files, and the software center shipped in Fedora, Ubuntu and OpenSuse is now an easy to use application filled with useful application metadata. Applications without metainfo files are no longer shown which provides quite some incentive to upstream projects wanting visibility in popular desktop environments. AppStream was first introduced in 2008 and since then many people have contributed to the specification. It is being used primarily for application metadata but also now is used for drivers, firmware, input methods and fonts. There are multiple projects producing AppStream metadata and also a number of projects consuming the final XML metadata.

When applications are being built as packages by a distribution then the AppStream generation is done automatically, and you do not need to do anything other than installing a .desktop file and an metainfo.xml file in the upstream tarball or zip file. If the application is being built on your own machines or cloud instance then the distributor will need to generate the AppStream metadata manually. This would for example be the case when internal-only or closed source software is being either used or produced. This document assumes you are currently building RPM packages and exporting yum-style repository metadata for Fedora or RHEL although the concepts are the same for rpm-on-OpenSuse or deb-on-Ubuntu.

NOTE: If you are building packages, make sure that there are not two applications installed with one single package. If this is currently the case split up the package so that there are multiple subpackages or mark one of the .desktop files as NoDisplay=true. Make sure the application-subpackages depend on any -common subpackage and deal with upgrades (perhaps using a metapackage) if you’ve shipped the application before.

Summary of Package building

So the steps outlined above explains the extra metadata you need to have your application show up in GNOME Software. This tutorial does not cover how to set up your build system to build these, but both for Meson and autotools you should be able to find a long range of examples online. And there are also major resources available to explain how to create a Fedora RPM or how to build a Flatpak. You probably also want to tie both the Desktop file and the metainfo file into your i18n system so the metadata in them can be translated. It is worth nothing here that while this document explains how you can do everything yourself we do generally recommend relying on existing community infrastructure for hosting source code and packages if you can (for instance if your application is open source), as they will save you work and effort over time. For instance putting your source code into the GNOME git will give you free access to the translator community in GNOME and thus increase the chance your application is internationalized significantly. And by building your package in Fedora you can get peer review of your package and free hosting of the resulting package. Or by putting your package up on Flathub you get wide cross distribution availability.

Setting up hosting infrastructure for your package

We will here explain how you set up a Yum repository for RPM packages that provides the needed metadata. If you are making a Flatpak we recommend skipping ahead to the Flatpak section a bit further down.

Yum hosting and Metadata:

When GNOME Software checks for updates it downloads various metadata files from the server describing the packages available in the repository. GNOME Software can also download AppStream metadata at the same time, allowing add-on repositories to include applications that are visible in the the software center. In most cases distributors are already building binary RPMS and then building metadata as an additional step by running something like this to generate the repomd files on a directory of packages. The tool for creating the repository metadata is called createrepo_c and is part of the package createrepo_c in Fedora. You can install it by running the command:


dnf install createrepo_c.

Once the tool is installed you can run these commands to generate your metadata:


$ createrepo_c --no-database --simple-md-filenames SRPMS/
$ createrepo_c --no-database --simple-md-filenames x86_64/

This creates the primary and filelist metadata required for updating on the command line. Next to build the metadata required for the software center we we need to actually generate the AppStream XML. The tool you need for this is called appstream-builder. This works by decompressing .rpm files and merging together the .desktop file, the .metainfo.xml file and preprocessing the icons. Remember, only applications installing AppData files will be included in the metadata.

You can install appstream builder in Fedora Workstation by using this command:

dnf install libappstream-glib-builder

Once it is installed you can run it by using the following syntax:

$ appstream-builder \
   --origin=yourcompanyname \
   --basename=appstream \
   --cache-dir=/tmp/asb-cache \
   --enable-hidpi \
   --max-threads=1 \
   --min-icon-size=32 \
   --output-dir=/tmp/asb-md \
   --packages-dir=x86_64/ \
   --temp-dir=/tmp/asb-icons

This takes a few minutes and generates some files to the output directory. Your output should look something like this:


Scanning packages...
Processing packages...
Merging applications...
Writing /tmp/asb-md/appstream.xml.gz...
Writing /tmp/asb-md/appstream-icons.tar.gz...
Writing /tmp/asb-md/appstream-screenshots.tar...Done!

The actual build output will depend on your compose server configuration. At this point you can also verify the application is visible in the yourcompanyname.xml.gz file.
We then have to take the generated XML and the tarball of icons and add it to the repomd.xml master document so that GNOME Software automatically downloads the content for searching.
This is as simple as doing:

modifyrepo_c \
    --no-compress \
    --simple-md-filenames \
    /tmp/asb-md/appstream.xml.gz \
    x86_64/repodata/
modifyrepo_c \
    --no-compress \
    --simple-md-filenames \
    /tmp/asb-md/appstream-icons.tar.gz \
    x86_64/repodata/

 

Deploying this metadata will allow GNOME Software to add the application metadata the next time the repository is refreshed, typically, once per day. Hosting your Yum repository on Github Github isn’t really set up for hosting Yum repositories, but here is a method that currently works. So once you created a local copy of your repository create a new project on github. Then use the follow commands to import your repository into github.


cd ~/src/myrepository
git init
git add -A
git commit -a -m "first commit"
git remote add origin git@github.com:yourgitaccount/myrepo.git
git push -u origin master

Once everything is important go into the github web interface and drill down in the file tree until you find the file called ‘repomd.xml’ and click on it. You should now see a button the github interface called ‘Raw’. Once you click that you get the raw version of the XML file and in the URL bar of your browser you should see a URL looking something like this:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cschalle/hubyum/master/noarch/repodata/repomd.xml
Copy that URL as you will need the information from it to create your .repo file which is what distributions and users want in order to reach you new repository. To create your .repo file copy this example and edit it to match your data:


[remarkable]
name=Remarkable Markdown editor software and updates
baseurl=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cschalle/hubyum/master/noarch
gpgcheck=0
enabled=1
enabled_metadata=1

So on top is your Repo shortname inside the brackets, then a name field with a more extensive name. For the baseurl paste the URL you copied earlier and remove the last bits until you are left with either the ‘norach’ directory or your platform directory for instance x86_64. Once you have that file completed put it into /etc/yum.repos.d on your computer and load up GNOME Software. Click on the ‘Updates’ button in GNOME Software and then on the refresh button in the top left corner to ensure your database is up to date. If everything works as expected you should then be able to do a search in GNOME software and find your new application showing up.

Example of self hosted RPM

Flapak hosting and Metadata

The flatpak-builder binary generates AppStream metadata automatically when building applications if the appstream-compose tool is installed on the flatpak build machine. Flatpak remotes are exported with a separate ‘appstream’ branch which is automatically downloaded by GNOME Software and no addition work if required when building your application or updating the remote. Adding the remote is enough to add the application to the software center, on the assumption the AppData file is valid.

Conclusions

AppStream files allow us to build a modern software center experience either using distro packages with yum-style metadata or with the new flatpak application deployment framework. By including a desktop file and AppData file for your Linux binary build your application can be easily found and installed by end users greatly expanding its userbase.

Why the open source driver release from NVIDIA is so important for Linux?

Posted on by

Background
Today NVIDIA announced that they are releasing an open source kernel driver for their GPUs, so I want to share with you some background information and how I think this will impact Linux graphics and compute going forward.

One thing many people are not aware of is that Red Hat is the only Linux OS company who has a strong presence in the Linux compute and graphics engineering space. There are of course a lot of other people working in the space too, like engineers working for Intel, AMD and NVIDIA or people working for consultancy companies like Collabora or individual community members, but Red Hat as an OS integration company has been very active on trying to ensure we have a maintainable and shared upstream open source stack. This engineering presence is also what has allowed us to move important technologies forward, like getting hiDPI support for Linux some years ago, or working with NVIDIA to get glvnd implemented to remove a pain point for our users since the original OpenGL design only allowed for one OpenGl implementation to be installed at a time. We see ourselves as the open source community’s partner here, fighting to keep the linux graphics stack coherent and maintainable and as a partner for the hardware OEMs to work with when they need help pushing major new initiatives around GPUs for Linux forward. And as the only linux vendor with a significant engineering footprint in GPUs we have been working closely with NVIDIA. People like Kevin Martin, the manager for our GPU technologies team, Ben Skeggs the maintainer of Nouveau and Dave Airlie, the upstream kernel maintainer for the graphics subsystem, Nouveau contributor Karol Herbst and our accelerator lead Tom Rix have all taken part in meetings, code reviews and discussions with NVIDIA. So let me talk a little about what this release means (and also what it doesn’t mean) and what we hope to see come out of this long term.

First of all, what is in this new driver?
What has been released is an out of tree source code kernel driver which has been tested to support CUDA usecases on datacenter GPUs. There is code in there to support display, but it is not complete or fully tested yet. Also this is only the kernel part, a big part of a modern graphics driver are to be found in the firmware and userspace components and those are still closed source. But it does mean we have a NVIDIA kernel driver now that will start being able to consume the GPL-only APIs in the linux kernel, although this initial release doesn’t consume any APIs the old driver wasn’t already using. The driver also only supports NVIDIA Turing chip GPUs and newer, which means it is not targeting GPUs from before 2018. So for the average Linux desktop user, while this is a great first step and hopefully a sign of what is to come, it is not something you are going to start using tomorrow.

What does it mean for the NVidia binary driver?
Not too much immediately. This binary kernel driver will continue to be needed for older pre-Turing NVIDIA GPUs and until the open source kernel module is full tested and extended for display usecases you are likely to continue using it for your system even if you are on Turing or newer. Also as mentioned above regarding firmware and userspace bits and the binary driver is going to continue to be around even once the open source kernel driver is fully capable.

What does it mean for Nouveau?
Let me start with the obvious, this is actually great news for the Nouveau community and the Nouveau driver and NVIDIA has done a great favour to the open source graphics community with this release. And for those unfamiliar with Nouveau, Nouveau is the in-kernel graphics driver for NVIDIA GPUs today which was originally developed as a reverse engineered driver, but which over recent years actually have had active support from NVIDIA. It is fully functional, but is severely hampered by not having had the ability to for instance re-clock the NVIDIA card, meaning that it can’t give you full performance like the binary driver can. This was something we were working with NVIDIA trying to remedy, but this new release provides us with a better path forward. So what does this new driver mean for Nouveau? Less initially, but a lot in the long run. To give a little background first. The linux kernel does not allow multiple drivers for the same hardware, so in order for a new NVIDIA kernel driver to go in the current one will have to go out or at least be limited to a different set of hardware. The current one is Nouveau. And just like the binary driver a big chunk of Nouveau is not in the kernel, but are the userspace pieces found in Mesa and the Nouveau specific firmware that NVIDIA currently kindly makes available. So regardless of the long term effort to create a new open source in-tree kernel driver based on this new open source driver for NVIDIA hardware, Nouveau will very likely be staying around to support pre-turing hardware just like the NVIDIA binary kernel driver will.

The plan we are working towards from our side, but which is likely to take a few years to come to full fruition, is to come up with a way for the NVIDIA binary driver and Mesa to share a kernel driver. The details of how we will do that is something we are still working on and discussing with our friends at NVIDIA to address both the needs of the NVIDIA userspace and the needs of the Mesa userspace. Along with that evolution we hope to work with NVIDIA engineers to refactor the userspace bits of Mesa that are now targeting just Nouveau to be able to interact with this new kernel driver and also work so that the binary driver and Nouveau can share the same firmware. This has clear advantages for both the open source community and the NVIDIA. For the open source community it means that we will now have a kernel driver and firmware that allows things like changing the clocking of the GPU to provide the kind of performance people expect from the NVIDIA graphics card and it means that we will have an open source driver that will have access to the firmware and kernel updates from day one for new generations of NVIDIA hardware. For the ‘binary’ driver, and I put that in ” signs because it will now be less binary :), it means as stated above that it can start taking advantage of the GPL-only APIs in the kernel, distros can ship it and enable secure boot, and it gets an open source consumer of its kernel driver allowing it to go upstream.
If this new shared kernel driver will be known as Nouveau or something completely different is still an open question, and of course it happening at all depends on if we and the rest of the open source community and NVIDIA are able to find a path together to make it happen, but so far everyone seems to be of good will.

What does this release mean for linux distributions like Fedora and RHEL?

Over time it provides a pathway to radically simplify supporting NVIDIA hardware due to the opportunities discussed elsewhere in this document. Long term we will hope be able to get a better user experience with NVIDIA hardware in terms out of box functionality. Which means day 1 support for new chipsets, a high performance open source Mesa driver for NVIDIA and it will allow us to sign the NVIDIA driver alongside the rest of the kernel to enable things like secureboot support. Since this first release is targeting compute one can expect that these options will first be available for compute users and then graphics at a later time.

What are the next steps
Well there is a lot of work to do here. NVIDIA need to continue the effort to make this new driver feature complete for both Compute and Graphics Display usecases, we’d like to work together to come up with a plan for what the future unified kernel driver can look like and a model around it that works for both the community and NVIDIA, we need to add things like a Mesa Vulkan driver. We at Red Hat will be playing an active part in this work as the only Linux vendor with the capacity to do so and we will also work to ensure that the wider open source community has a chance to participate fully like we do for all open source efforts we are part of.

If you want to hear more about this I did talk with Chris Fisher and Linux Action News about this topic. Note: I did state some timelines in that interview which I didn’t make clear was my guesstimates and not in any form official NVIDIA timelines, so apologize for the confusion.

Why is Kopper and Zink important? AKA the future of OpenGL

Posted on by

Since Kopper got merged today upstream I wanted to write a little about it as I think the value it brings can be unclear for the uninitiated.

Adam Jackson in our graphics team has been working for the last Months together with other community members like Mike Blumenkrantz implementing Kopper. For those unaware Zink is an OpenGL implementation running on top of Vulkan and Kopper is the layer that allows you to translate OpenGL and GLX window handling to Vulkan WSI handling. This means that you can get full OpenGL support even if your GPU only has a Vulkan driver available and it also means you can for instance run GNOME on top of this stack thanks to the addition of Kopper to Zink.

During the lifecycle of the soon to be released Fedora Workstation 36 we expect to allow you to turn on the doing OpenGL using Kopper and Zink as an experimental feature once we update Fedora 36 to Mesa 22.1.

So you might ask why would I care about this as an end user? Well initially you probably will not care much, but over time it is likely that GPU makers will eventually stop developing native OpenGL drivers and just focus on their Vulkan drivers. At that point Zink and Kopper provides you with a backwards compatibility solution for your OpenGL applications. And for Linux distributions it will also at some point help reduce the amount of code we need to ship and maintain significantly as we can just rely on Zink and Kopper everywhere which of course reduces the workload for maintainers.

This is not going to be an overnight transition though, Zink and Kopper will need some time to stabilize and further improve performance. At the moment performance is generally a bit slower than the native drivers, but we have seen some examples of games which actually got better performance with specific driver combinations, but over time we expect to see the negative performance delta shrink. The delta is unlikely to ever fully go away due to the cost of translating between the two APIs, but on the other side we are going to be in a situation in a few years where all current/new applications use Vulkan natively (or through Proton) and thus the stuff that relies on OpenGL will be older software, so combined with faster GPUs you should still get more than good enough performance. And at that point Zink will be a lifesaver for your old OpenGL based applications and games.

Getting rid of the need for the usecase Linux distribution

Posted on by

There was an article on Open for Everyone today about Nobara, a Fedora-based distribution optimized for gaming. So I have no beef with Tomas Crider or any other creator/maintainer of a distribution targeting a specific use case. In fact they are usually trying to solve or work around real problems and make things easier for people. That said I have for years felt that the need for these things is a failing in itself and it has been a goal for me in the context of Fedora Workstation to figure out what we can do to remove the need for ‘usecase distros’. So I thought it would be of interest if I talk a bit about how I been viewing these things and the concrete efforts we taken to reduce the need for usecase oriented distributions. It is worth noting that the usecase distributions have of course proven useful for this too, in the sense that they to some degree also function as a very detailed ‘bug report’ for why the general case OS is not enough.
Before I start, you might say, but isn’t Fedora Workstation as usecase OS too? You often talk about having a developer focus? Yes, developers are something we care deeply about, but for instance that doesn’t mean we pre-install 50 IDEs in Fedora Workstation. Fedora Workstation should be a great general purpose OS out of the box and then we should have tools like GNOME Software and Toolbx available to let you quickly and easily tweak it into your ideal development system. But at the same time by being a general purpose OS at heart, it should be equally easy to install Steam and Lutris to start gaming or install Carla and Ardour to start doing audio production. Or install OBS Studio to do video streaming.

Looking back over the years one of the first conclusions I drew from looking at all the usecase distributions out there was that they often where mostly the standard distro, but with a carefully procured list of pre-installed software, for instance the old Fedora game spin was exactly that, a copy of Fedora with a lot of games pre-installed. So why was this valuable to people? For those of us who have been around for a while we remember that the average linux ‘app store’ was a very basic GUI which listed available software by name (usually quite cryptic names) and at best with a small icon. There was almost no other metadata available and search functionality was limited at best. So finding software was not simple, at it was usually more of a ‘search the internet and if you find something interesting see if its packaged for your distro’. So the usecase distros who focused on having procured pre-installed software, be that games, or pro-audio software or graphics tools ot whatever was their focus was basically responding to the fact that finding software was non-trivial and a lot of people maybe missed out on software that could be useful to them since it they simply never learned about its existence.
So when we kicked of the creation of GNOME Software one of the big focuses early on was to create a system for providing good metadata and displaying that metadata in a useful manner. So as an end user the most obvious change was of course the more rich UI of GNOME Software, but maybe just as important was the creation of AppStream, which was a specification for how applications to ship with metadata to allow GNOME Software and others to display much more in-depth information about the application and provide screenshots and so on.

So I do believe that between working on a better ‘App Store’ story for linux between the work on GNOME Software as the actual UI, but also by working with many stakeholders in the Linux ecosystem to define metadata standards like AppStream we made software a lot more discoverable on Linux and thus reduced the need for pre-loading significantly. This work also provided an important baseline for things like Flathub to thrive, as it then had a clear way to provide metadata about the applications it hosts.
We do continue to polish that user experience on an ongoing basis, but I do feel we reduced the need to pre-load a ton of software very significantly already with this.

Of course another aspect of this is application availability, which is why we worked to ensure things like Steam is available in GNOME Software on Fedora Workstation, and which we have now expanded on by starting to include more and more software listings from Flathub. These things makes it easy for our users to find the software they want, but at the same time we are still staying true to our mission of only shipping free software by default in Fedora.

The second major reason for usecase distributions have been that the generic version of the OS didn’t really have the right settings or setup to handle an important usecase. I think pro-audio is the best example of this where usecase distros like Fedora Jam or Ubuntu Studio popped up. The pre-install a lot of relevant software was definitely part of their DNA too, but there was also other issues involved, like the need for a special audio setup with JACK and often also kernel real-time patches applied. When we decided to include Pro-audio support in PipeWire resolving these issues was a big part of it. I strongly believe that we should be able to provide a simple and good out-of-the box experience for musicians and audio engineers on Linux without needing the OS to be specifically configured for the task. The strong and positive response we gotten from the Pro-audio community for PipeWire I believe points to that we are moving in the right direction there. Not claiming things are 100% yet, but we feel very confident that we will get there with PipeWire and make the Pro-Audio folks full fledged members of the Fedora WS community. Interestingly we also spent quite a bit of time trying to ensure the pro-audio tools in Fedora has proper AppStream metadata so that they would appear in GNOME Software as part of this. One area there where we are still looking at is the real time kernel stuff, our current take is that we do believe the remaining unmerged patches are not strictly needed anymore, as most of the important stuff has already been merged, but we are monitoring it as we keep developing and benchmarking PipeWire for the Pro-Audio usecase.

Another reason that I often saw that drove the creation of a usecase distribution is special hardware support, and not necessarily that special hardware, the NVidia driver for instance has triggered a lot of these attempts. The NVidia driver is challenging on a lot of levels and has been something we have been constantly working on. There was technical issues for instance, like the NVidia driver and Mesa fighting over who owned the OpenGL.so implementation, which we fixed by the introduction glvnd a few years ago. But for a distro like Fedora that also cares deeply about free and open source software it also provided us with a lot of philosophical challenges. We had to answer the question of how could we on one side make sure our users had easy access to the driver without abandoning our principle around Fedora only shipping free software of out the box? I think we found a good compromise today where the NVidia driver is available in Fedora Workstation for easy install through GNOME Software, but at the same time default to Nouveau of the box. That said this is a part of the story where we are still hard at work to improve things further and while I am not at liberty to mention any details I think I can at least mention that we are meeting with our engineering counterparts at NVidia on almost a weekly basis to discuss how to improve things, not just for graphics, but around compute and other shared areas of interest. The most recent public result of that collaboration was of course the XWayland support in recent NVidia drivers, but I promise you that this is something we keep focusing on and I expect that we will be able to share more cool news and important progress over the course of the year, both for users of the NVidia binary driver and for users of Nouveau.

What are we still looking at in terms of addressing issues like this? Well one thing we are talking about is if there is value/need for a facility to install specific software based on hardware or software. For instance if we detect a high end gaming mouse connected to your system should we install Piper/ratbag or at least make GNOME Software suggest it? And if we detect that you installed Lutris and Steam are there other tools we should recommend you install, like the gamemode GNOME Shell extenion? It is a somewhat hard question to answer, which is why we are still pondering it, on one side it seems like a nice addition, but such connections would mean that we need to have a big database we constantly maintain which isn’t trivial and also having something running on your system to lets say check for those high end mice do add a little overhead that might be a waste for many users.

Another area that we are looking at is the issue of codecs. We did a big effort a couple of years ago and got AC3, mp3, AAC and mpeg2 video cleared for inclusion, and also got the OpenH264 implementation from Cisco made available. That solved a lot of issues, but today with so many more getting into media creation I believe we need to take another stab at it and for instance try to get reliable hardware accelerated encoding and decoding on video. I am not ready to announce anything, but we got a few ideas and leads we are looking at for how to move the needle there in a significant way.

So to summarize, I am not criticizing anyone for putting together what I call usecase distros, but at the same time I really want to get to a point where they are rarely needed, because we should be able to cater to most needs within the context of a general purpose Linux operating system. That said I do appreciate the effort of these distro makers both in terms of trying to help users have a better experience on linux and in indirectly helping us showcase both potential solutions or highlight the major pain points that still needs addressing in a general purpose Linux desktop operating system.

PipeWire and fixing the Linux Video Capture stack

Posted on by

Wim Taymans

Wim Taymans laying out the vision for the future of Linux multimedia


PipeWire has already made great strides forward in terms of improving the audio handling situation on Linux, but one of the original goals was to also bring along the video side of the house. In fact in the first few releases of Fedora Workstation where we shipped PipeWire we solely enabled it as a tool to handle screen sharing for Wayland and Flatpaks. So with PipeWire having stabilized a lot for audio now we feel the time has come to go back to the video side of PipeWire and work to improve the state-of-art for video capture handling under Linux. Wim Taymans did a presentation to our team inside Red Hat on the 30th of September talking about the current state of the world and where we need to go to move forward. I thought the information and ideas in his presentation deserved wider distribution so this blog post is building on that presentation to share it more widely and also hopefully rally the community to support us in this endeavour.

The current state of video capture, usually webcams, handling on Linux is basically the v4l2 kernel API. It has served us well for a lot of years, but we believe that just like you don’t write audio applications directly to the ALSA API anymore, you should neither write video applications directly to the v4l2 kernel API anymore. With PipeWire we can offer a lot more flexibility, security and power for video handling, just like it does for audio. The v4l2 API is an open/ioctl/mmap/read/write/close based API, meant for a single application to access at a time. There is a library called libv4l2, but nobody uses it because it causes more problems than it solves (no mmap, slow conversions, quirks). But there is no need to rely on the kernel API anymore as there are GStreamer and PipeWire plugins for v4l2 allowing you to access it using the GStreamer or PipeWire API instead. So our goal is not to replace v4l2, just as it is not our goal to replace ALSA, v4l2 and ALSA are still the kernel driver layer for video and audio.

It is also worth considering that new cameras are getting more and more complicated and thus configuring them are getting more complicated. Driving this change is a new set of cameras on the way often called MIPI cameras, as they adhere to the API standards set by the MiPI Alliance. Partly driven by this V4l2 is in active development with a Codec API addition, statefull/stateless, DMABUF, request API and also adding a Media Controller (MC) Graph with nodes, ports, links of processing blocks. This means that the threshold for an application developer to use these APIs directly is getting very high in addition to the aforementioned issues of single application access, the security issues of direct kernel access and so on.

libcamera logo


Libcamera is meant to be the userland library for v4l2.


Of course we are not the only ones seeing the growing complexity of cameras as a challenge for developers and thus libcamera has been developed to make interacting with these cameras easier. Libcamera provides unified API for setup and capture for cameras, it hides the complexity of modern camera devices, it is supported for ChromeOS, Android and Linux.
One way to describe libcamera is as the MESA of cameras. Libcamera provides hooks to run (out-of-process) vendor extensions like for image processing or enhancement. Using libcamera is considering pretty much a requirement for embedded systems these days, but also newer Intel chips will also have IPUs configurable with media controllers.

Libcamera is still under heavy development upstream and do not yet have a stable ABI, but they did add a .so version very recently which will make packaging in Fedora and elsewhere a lot simpler. In fact we have builds in Fedora ready now. Libcamera also ships with a set of GStreamer plugins which means you should be able to get for instance Cheese working through libcamera in theory (although as we will go into, we think this is the wrong approach).

Before I go further an important thing to be aware of here is that unlike on ALSA, where PipeWire can provide a virtual ALSA device to provide backwards compatibility with older applications using the ALSA API directly, there is no such option possible for v4l2. So application developers will need to port to something new here, be that libcamera or PipeWire. So what do we feel is the right way forward?

Ideal Linux Multimedia Stack

How we envision the Linux multimedia stack going forward


Above you see an illustration of what we believe should be how the stack looks going forward. If you made this drawing of what the current state is, then thanks to our backwards compatibility with ALSA, PulseAudio and Jack, all the applications would be pointing at PipeWire for their audio handling like they are in the illustration you see above, but all the video handling from most applications would be pointing directly at v4l2 in this diagram. At the same time we don’t want applications to port to libcamera either as it doesn’t offer a lot of the flexibility than using PipeWire will, but instead what we propose is that all applications target PipeWire in combination with the video camera portal API. Be aware that the video portal is not an alternative or a abstraction of the PipeWire API, it is just a way to set up the connection to PipeWire that has the added bonus of working if your application is shipping as a Flatpak or another type of desktop container. PipeWire would then be in charge of talking to libcamera or v42l for video, just like PipeWire is in charge of talking with ALSA on the audio side. Having PipeWire be the central hub means we get a lot of the same advantages for video that we get for audio. For instance as the application developer you interact with PipeWire regardless of if what you want is a screen capture, a camera feed or a video being played back. Multiple applications can share the same camera and at the same time there are security provided to avoid the camera being used without your knowledge to spy on you. And also we can have patchbay applications that supports video pipelines and not just audio, like Carla provides for Jack applications. To be clear this feature will not come for ‘free’ from Jack patchbays since Jack only does audio, but hopefully new PipeWire patchbays like Helvum can add video support.

So what about GStreamer you might ask. Well GStreamer is a great way to write multimedia applications and we strongly recommend it, but we do not recommend your GStreamer application using the v4l2 or libcamera plugins, instead we recommend that you use the PipeWire plugins, this is of course a little different from the audio side where PipeWire supports the PulseAudio and Jack APIs and thus you don’t need to port, but by targeting the PipeWire plugins in GStreamer your GStreamer application will get the full PipeWire featureset.

So what is our plan of action>
So we will start putting the pieces in place for this step by step in Fedora Workstation. We have already started on this by working on the libcamera support in PipeWire and packaging libcamera for Fedora. We will set it up so that PipeWire can have option to switch between v4l2 and libcamera, so that most users can keep using the v4l2 through PipeWire for the time being, while we work with upstream and the community to mature libcamera and its PipeWire backend. We will also enable device discoverer for PipeWire.

We are also working on maturing the GStreamer elements for PipeWire for the video capture usecase as we expect a lot of application developers will just be using GStreamer as opposed to targeting PipeWire directly. We will start with Cheese as our initial testbed for this work as it is a fairly simple application, using Cheese as a proof of concept to have it use PipeWire for camera access. We are still trying to decide if we will make Cheese speak directly with PipeWire, or have it talk to PipeWire through the pipewiresrc GStreamer plugin, but have their pro and cons in the context of testing and verifying this.

We will also start working with the Chromium and Firefox projects to have them use the Camera portal and PipeWire for camera support just like we did work with them through WebRTC for the screen sharing support using PipeWire.

There are a few major items we are still trying to decide upon in terms of the interaction between PipeWire and the Camera portal API. It would be tempting to see if we can hide the Camera portal API behind the PipeWire API, or failing that at least hide it for people using the GStreamer plugin. That way all applications get the portal support for free when porting to GStreamer instead of requiring using the Camera portal API as a second step. On the other side you need to set up the screen sharing portal yourself, so it would probably make things more consistent if we left it to application developers to do for camera access too.

What do we want from the community here?
First step is just help us with testing as we roll this out in Fedora Workstation and Cheese. While libcamera was written motivated by MIPI cameras, all webcams are meant to work through it, and thus all webcams are meant to work with PipeWire using the libcamera backend. At the moment that is not the case and thus community testing and feedback is critical for helping us and the libcamera community to mature libcamera. We hope that by allowing you to easily configure PipeWire to use the libcamera backend (and switch back after you are done testing) we can get a lot of you to test and let us what what cameras are not working well yet.

A little further down the road please start planning moving any application you maintain or contribute to away from v4l2 API and towards PipeWire. If your application is a GStreamer application the transition should be fairly simple going from the v4l2 plugins to the pipewire plugins, but beyond that you should familiarize yourself with the Camera portal API and the PipeWire API for accessing cameras.

For further news and information on PipeWire follow our @PipeWireP twitter account and for general news and information about what we are doing in Fedora Workstation make sure to follow me on twitter @cfkschaller.
PipeWire